<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Media Center Vs Apple FrontRow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Webterractive</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-572201</link>
		<dc:creator>Webterractive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-572201</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have both Windows Vista Home Premium and OS X 10.4 Tiger, and I find that Front Row seems to look incomplete with only a few options, thats why there is an "Apple TV". Windows Media Center seems to have more options and choices. But as performance is concerned, Apple's Front Row is 10X better then Windows Media Center. It is much more responsive and no annoying lagging.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have both Windows Vista Home Premium and OS X 10.4 Tiger, and I find that Front Row seems to look incomplete with only a few options, thats why there is an &#8220;Apple TV&#8221;. Windows Media Center seems to have more options and choices. But as performance is concerned, Apple&#8217;s Front Row is 10X better then Windows Media Center. It is much more responsive and no annoying lagging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-446699</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-446699</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a Mac fan but I have to say I was pretty dissapointed with the release of Apple TV. I was, however, blown away with the Xbox media center (an unsupported hack of the Xbox). With this one mod box, you can play games (of course), show slideshows, listen to music, internet radio, check personalized RSS feeds (displayed as a ticker that scrolls along the bottom of the screen) and of course, play DVDs, as well as ANY kind of video media -- DVix, AVI, QuickTime, Windows Media, you name it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The thing that all of these media centers don't do is get rid of all those remotes. Everything is redundant, right? I mean why do you need a surround sound decoder on your VCR or HD DVD player if you already have that capacity from your TV? And why bother feeding a preamped audio signal into your  receiver if all you need are powered speakers? Why bother buying a TiVo if your Apple TV has a 180 GIG hard drive?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My ideal set up would be a menu-driven system with one remote -- like Apple's remote only non-IR please -- and something like a mac mini that could play, rip and/or record DVDs, HD DVDs and any other kind of video including off-the-air digital HD TV. This device should be able to send surround sound signals to powered speakers (like a Bose system) when needed. And, of course, you should be able to play games with a couple of wireless game controllers. No external receiver, DVD player, VTR, VPR, or TV tuner. Anybody else on board?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Mac fan but I have to say I was pretty dissapointed with the release of Apple TV. I was, however, blown away with the Xbox media center (an unsupported hack of the Xbox). With this one mod box, you can play games (of course), show slideshows, listen to music, internet radio, check personalized RSS feeds (displayed as a ticker that scrolls along the bottom of the screen) and of course, play DVDs, as well as ANY kind of video media &#8212; DVix, AVI, QuickTime, Windows Media, you name it.</p>
<p>The thing that all of these media centers don&#8217;t do is get rid of all those remotes. Everything is redundant, right? I mean why do you need a surround sound decoder on your VCR or HD DVD player if you already have that capacity from your TV? And why bother feeding a preamped audio signal into your  receiver if all you need are powered speakers? Why bother buying a TiVo if your Apple TV has a 180 GIG hard drive?</p>
<p>My ideal set up would be a menu-driven system with one remote &#8212; like Apple&#8217;s remote only non-IR please &#8212; and something like a mac mini that could play, rip and/or record DVDs, HD DVDs and any other kind of video including off-the-air digital HD TV. This device should be able to send surround sound signals to powered speakers (like a Bose system) when needed. And, of course, you should be able to play games with a couple of wireless game controllers. No external receiver, DVD player, VTR, VPR, or TV tuner. Anybody else on board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manpan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-290463</link>
		<dc:creator>manpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-290463</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I got Apple's 2nd generation Mac Mini with Intel Core Duo processor originally preinstalled with Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.7 but updated to 10.4.10 now (I know some users have been having problems with this update but it seems just fine for me), I have bought some TV shows and a few movies on iTunes Store, games for iPod and some music. I actually bought my iPod from Amazon.com and a single music CD from Amazon but most of my music I ended up buying to transfer to iPod later on was from iTunes. I think Amazon's plans to expand its music business into music downloads to compete with iTunes and offer DRM free music should be interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A friend of mine went the Windows Media Center route and got an HP Pavillion notebook computer with WIndows XP Media Center Edition 2005 preinstalled that is also Windows Vista ready. I don't blame my friend wanting more features but think I made the better choice as more features will be added to Front Row over time and is more simple to manage and navigate content than Media Center. The Mac Mini is a cheap yet reliable, and efficient desktop computer at the low-end of the market for people that want a Mac desktop but don't want the high-end iMacs or Mac Pro computers and don't want a notebook from Apple either. Mac Mini is best for people like me who already have our own peripherals to plug into the computer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mac Mini is also good for multimedia as I said -- its even better than Apple TV which is a stripped down Mac Mini designed for HDTVs as it supports more video codecs and functions as a device that can play media and/or enable computing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apple TV works better as a media extender than a computer -- the computer features are unavailable unless you tried hacking the system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use my Mac Mini with my video iPod and plan to upgrade to OS X Leopard 10.5 Family Pack. I only use a Windows PC to play hard core games (I need ability to customize hardware myself to improve game performance, graphics etc something unavailable on Macs), record TV with my TV Tuner capture card (find capture cards are better than USB TV Tuners have tried both with Windows and PC TV Tuner capture cards have better quality than USB TV Tuners (tried an AverMedia USB based TV Tuner but replaced it with a better ATI TV Wonder VE that works with VirtualDub on WIndows and use Huffyuv video codec for encoding video during capture process), I expect a Mac based TV Tuner (since they're all USB) will function like my old AverMedia based tuner and give lower quality capture.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I reccommend the following read: http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/RDM.Tech.Q1.07/841EDBB5-1245-42AD-A733-B9B29957347B.html "Windows XP Media Center Edition vs. Apple TV" this compares Microsoft products to Apple media solutions and discusses WebTV becoming MSN TV how it was a great product but Microsoft ruined it, the emergence of XBox game systems from Microsoft and the arrival of WIndows Media Center compare that to cable TV company DVRs and those of TiVO plus Apple TV review. It says Microsoft doesn't like competition because its a poor competitor. Even when they make a successful product if consumers buy a Microsoft product  like Media Center they expand into nw markets and crush competitors. MS has an unfair advantage they monopolize the market completely not allowing competition.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is why I try to stay away from Microsoft products. Have never used MSN TV even when it was Web TV but would have considered using it in future if still Web TV, never used XBox and never used Media Center. If Microsoft makes a good product I still look for better products because this is Microsoft the evil empire from Redmond Washington. To make matters worse when people buy Microsoft products and then complain about limitations its their fault for buying them in the first place and if you go to buy an alternative product but Microsoft already killed the alternatives your forced to go with Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Microsoft it can be argued also is not that good at making hardware products anyways. Their better in software but even their software is not best in the world take the consumer adoption of iTunes over Windows Media Player or iPods over WIndows Media based devices, success of Mozilla Firefox which helped restart the browser wars after Microsoft killed Netscape by bundling Internet Explorer with WIndows forced Microsoft to finally innovate IE. Their was no new features or nothing special about IE 5 after all compared to IE 6. Microsoft was forced if they wanted to keep market share to release IE 7 as an innovative browser. WHen Microsoft is forced to innovate they do but otherwise they don't. IE 6 had nothing innovayive about it compared to IE 5.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Same could be said about Windows 98 compared to WIndows 95 was just WIndows 95 with Internet Explorer bundled. No new major features in the OS itself besides the bundling of IE application.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I try to stay away from buying Microsoft products even when they are good to help underdogs out and Apple in some cases is still an underdog with its Mac computer business although it is growing its OS market share is less than Windows. Sometimes going for the underdog is not entirely neccessary but supporting companies less monopolistic than Microsoft are.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I support Apple to strike a blow at Microsoft. Sure Microsoft supports Apple's Mac business -- Apple's success is both good and bad news for Microsoft but in the bad news perspective I support Apple to oppose the will of Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mac Mini is a much better media center computer than any with Microsoft's OS offerings preinstalled. My next Mac will probably be an iMac and maybe Apple TV and iPhone eventually.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got Apple&#8217;s 2nd generation Mac Mini with Intel Core Duo processor originally preinstalled with Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.7 but updated to 10.4.10 now (I know some users have been having problems with this update but it seems just fine for me), I have bought some TV shows and a few movies on iTunes Store, games for iPod and some music. I actually bought my iPod from Amazon.com and a single music CD from Amazon but most of my music I ended up buying to transfer to iPod later on was from iTunes. I think Amazon&#8217;s plans to expand its music business into music downloads to compete with iTunes and offer DRM free music should be interesting.</p>
<p>A friend of mine went the Windows Media Center route and got an HP Pavillion notebook computer with WIndows XP Media Center Edition 2005 preinstalled that is also Windows Vista ready. I don&#8217;t blame my friend wanting more features but think I made the better choice as more features will be added to Front Row over time and is more simple to manage and navigate content than Media Center. The Mac Mini is a cheap yet reliable, and efficient desktop computer at the low-end of the market for people that want a Mac desktop but don&#8217;t want the high-end iMacs or Mac Pro computers and don&#8217;t want a notebook from Apple either. Mac Mini is best for people like me who already have our own peripherals to plug into the computer.</p>
<p>Mac Mini is also good for multimedia as I said &#8212; its even better than Apple TV which is a stripped down Mac Mini designed for HDTVs as it supports more video codecs and functions as a device that can play media and/or enable computing.</p>
<p>Apple TV works better as a media extender than a computer &#8212; the computer features are unavailable unless you tried hacking the system.</p>
<p>I use my Mac Mini with my video iPod and plan to upgrade to OS X Leopard 10.5 Family Pack. I only use a Windows PC to play hard core games (I need ability to customize hardware myself to improve game performance, graphics etc something unavailable on Macs), record TV with my TV Tuner capture card (find capture cards are better than USB TV Tuners have tried both with Windows and PC TV Tuner capture cards have better quality than USB TV Tuners (tried an AverMedia USB based TV Tuner but replaced it with a better ATI TV Wonder VE that works with VirtualDub on WIndows and use Huffyuv video codec for encoding video during capture process), I expect a Mac based TV Tuner (since they&#8217;re all USB) will function like my old AverMedia based tuner and give lower quality capture.</p>
<p>I reccommend the following read:  (<a href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/RDM.Tech.Q1.07/841EDBB5-1245-42AD-A733-B9B29957347B.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  &#8220;Windows XP Media Center Edition vs. Apple TV&#8221; this compares Microsoft products to Apple media solutions and discusses WebTV becoming MSN TV how it was a great product but Microsoft ruined it, the emergence of XBox game systems from Microsoft and the arrival of WIndows Media Center compare that to cable TV company DVRs and those of TiVO plus Apple TV review. It says Microsoft doesn&#8217;t like competition because its a poor competitor. Even when they make a successful product if consumers buy a Microsoft product  like Media Center they expand into nw markets and crush competitors. MS has an unfair advantage they monopolize the market completely not allowing competition.</p>
<p>That is why I try to stay away from Microsoft products. Have never used MSN TV even when it was Web TV but would have considered using it in future if still Web TV, never used XBox and never used Media Center. If Microsoft makes a good product I still look for better products because this is Microsoft the evil empire from Redmond Washington. To make matters worse when people buy Microsoft products and then complain about limitations its their fault for buying them in the first place and if you go to buy an alternative product but Microsoft already killed the alternatives your forced to go with Microsoft.</p>
<p>Microsoft it can be argued also is not that good at making hardware products anyways. Their better in software but even their software is not best in the world take the consumer adoption of iTunes over Windows Media Player or iPods over WIndows Media based devices, success of Mozilla Firefox which helped restart the browser wars after Microsoft killed Netscape by bundling Internet Explorer with WIndows forced Microsoft to finally innovate IE. Their was no new features or nothing special about IE 5 after all compared to IE 6. Microsoft was forced if they wanted to keep market share to release IE 7 as an innovative browser. WHen Microsoft is forced to innovate they do but otherwise they don&#8217;t. IE 6 had nothing innovayive about it compared to IE 5.</p>
<p>Same could be said about Windows 98 compared to WIndows 95 was just WIndows 95 with Internet Explorer bundled. No new major features in the OS itself besides the bundling of IE application.</p>
<p>So I try to stay away from buying Microsoft products even when they are good to help underdogs out and Apple in some cases is still an underdog with its Mac computer business although it is growing its OS market share is less than Windows. Sometimes going for the underdog is not entirely neccessary but supporting companies less monopolistic than Microsoft are.</p>
<p>I support Apple to strike a blow at Microsoft. Sure Microsoft supports Apple&#8217;s Mac business &#8212; Apple&#8217;s success is both good and bad news for Microsoft but in the bad news perspective I support Apple to oppose the will of Microsoft.</p>
<p>Mac Mini is a much better media center computer than any with Microsoft&#8217;s OS offerings preinstalled. My next Mac will probably be an iMac and maybe Apple TV and iPhone eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Mac Mini Ready for (PVR) Prime Time?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28106</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Mac Mini Ready for (PVR) Prime Time?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28106</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] October 23, 2005: Microsoft Media Center vs Apple Front Row [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 23, 2005: Microsoft Media Center vs Apple Front Row [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konrad Neuwirth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28105</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad Neuwirth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28105</guid>
		<description>I enter this debate impressively late, but was just listening to a podcast the other day and do not share the general view.  Maybe I'm way off, but I think that &lt;a href="http://blog.fimsch.net/?p=115" rel="nofollow"&gt;it all makes sense.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enter this debate impressively late, but was just listening to a podcast the other day and do not share the general view.  Maybe I&#8217;m way off, but I think that <a href="http://blog.fimsch.net/?p=115" rel="nofollow">it all makes sense.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ipod way to your living room &#124; Web Analyst</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28104</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ipod way to your living room &#124; Web Analyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28104</guid>
		<description>[...] I can see a Mini in my living room - I can&#8217;t see a Windows Media Center thingy. Fascinating how Apple choose its cheapest hardware for the entertainment center, whilst Microsoft picked the more expensive route. Simplicity will win again, argued Malik a few days ago. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can see a Mini in my living room - I can&#8217;t see a Windows Media Center thingy. Fascinating how Apple choose its cheapest hardware for the entertainment center, whilst Microsoft picked the more expensive route. Simplicity will win again, argued Malik a few days ago. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28103</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28103</guid>
		<description>Msoft will get there eventually with MCE, but they made a big mistake of shipping it on top of  traditional Windows and giving all access to Windows features, which causes confusion, and invites users to completely screw up the system.

I wrote in an August blog that the trick is to enter the living room with a a single-purpose machine that works really well, then pile on the additional apps slowly, methodically.

Tivo and Apple provide good lessons for this approach, although it took Tivo way too long to implement.

See:

TiVo Lesson for Living Room: One Function at a Time
"Now that TiVo has released a developers' kit, new apps are pouring in. It could be a lesson for makers of all-purpose machines. Maybe start with a great single-purpose device, then grow from there?"
http://blog.ce-pro.com/news/2800.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Msoft will get there eventually with MCE, but they made a big mistake of shipping it on top of  traditional Windows and giving all access to Windows features, which causes confusion, and invites users to completely screw up the system.</p>
<p>I wrote in an August blog that the trick is to enter the living room with a a single-purpose machine that works really well, then pile on the additional apps slowly, methodically.</p>
<p>Tivo and Apple provide good lessons for this approach, although it took Tivo way too long to implement.</p>
<p>See:</p>
<p>TiVo Lesson for Living Room: One Function at a Time<br />
&#8220;Now that TiVo has released a developers&#8217; kit, new apps are pouring in. It could be a lesson for makers of all-purpose machines. Maybe start with a great single-purpose device, then grow from there?&#8221;<br />
 (<a href="http://blog.ce-pro.com/news/2800.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28102</guid>
		<description>There's an alternative to both Apple and Microsoft when mediacentres are concerned. Take a closer look at Welton Way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an alternative to both Apple and Microsoft when mediacentres are concerned. Take a closer look at Welton Way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane blyth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28101</link>
		<dc:creator>shane blyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 07:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28101</guid>
		<description>Front row is not a media centre like media centre.. why do people always try to compare stuff like this when it is just a front end for the existing apps to make it easier..
Media centre is to replace your TV
Front row and imac is a computer not a TV replacement
It is different and fits in a different market.
All the media centre guys jump up and down but the guy on the street may buy an apple and front row not to replace their tv set but for ease of access to there songs and the like
It's like the bed i saw advertised.. It has an inbuilt sounds sytem with an ipod dock and remote. now is this a "media centre too " Lets now buash the bed idea becuase it doesn't have Tivo or a screen or something.
Front row is different to Windows media centre. It suits some people like me a lot better It means i can  show off my photos and change itunes with a nice simple remote and it doesnt have to live where my TV does. If i wanted a media centre TV i would buy it but it doesnt suit my needs..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Front row is not a media centre like media centre.. why do people always try to compare stuff like this when it is just a front end for the existing apps to make it easier..<br />
Media centre is to replace your TV<br />
Front row and imac is a computer not a TV replacement<br />
It is different and fits in a different market.<br />
All the media centre guys jump up and down but the guy on the street may buy an apple and front row not to replace their tv set but for ease of access to there songs and the like<br />
It&#8217;s like the bed i saw advertised.. It has an inbuilt sounds sytem with an ipod dock and remote. now is this a &#8220;media centre too &#8221; Lets now buash the bed idea becuase it doesn&#8217;t have Tivo or a screen or something.<br />
Front row is different to Windows media centre. It suits some people like me a lot better It means i can  show off my photos and change itunes with a nice simple remote and it doesnt have to live where my TV does. If i wanted a media centre TV i would buy it but it doesnt suit my needs..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logic2Go</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28100</link>
		<dc:creator>Logic2Go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28100</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Apple FrontRow vs. Windows Media Center&lt;/strong&gt;

	Ok, so Apple goes ahead and releases a single software that pretty much undermines most of the push behind Microsoft&#8217;s Media Center Edition of Windows XP.
	WooHoo!
	I could almost go ahead and whisper that Apple copied M$, but wait &#8230; they ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Apple FrontRow vs. Windows Media Center</strong></p>
<p>	Ok, so Apple goes ahead and releases a single software that pretty much undermines most of the push behind Microsoft&#8217;s Media Center Edition of Windows XP.<br />
	WooHoo!<br />
	I could almost go ahead and whisper that Apple copied M$, but wait &#8230; they &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: player window</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28099</link>
		<dc:creator>player window</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28099</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey, I have to admit, Media Center is more powerful then Apple&#8217;s Front Row. I don&#8217;t think Apple was going after the MCE crowd specifically to woo them over ala &#8220;switch&#8221; with Front Row. No, I think they were giving the basic mom and pop user just one more reason to buy a Mac. Either way, the debate rages on and Om Malik&#8217;s blog has a great post on this very battle. I love this quote he lifted: Steve Jobs comparing the Apple remote control with the Media Center remote control was nothing but sheer marketing brilliance. It’s totally not about which remote control is better. Not at all. By making this comparison, Steve Jobs gave the illusion the two products were on equal footing EXCEPT for the remote. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey, I have to admit, Media Center is more powerful then Apple&#8217;s Front Row. I don&#8217;t think Apple was going after the MCE crowd specifically to woo them over ala &#8220;switch&#8221; with Front Row. No, I think they were giving the basic mom and pop user just one more reason to buy a Mac. Either way, the debate rages on and Om Malik&#8217;s blog has a great post on this very battle. I love this quote he lifted: Steve Jobs comparing the Apple remote control with the Media Center remote control was nothing but sheer marketing brilliance. It’s totally not about which remote control is better. Not at all. By making this comparison, Steve Jobs gave the illusion the two products were on equal footing EXCEPT for the remote. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Automation Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Media Center Vs Apple FrontRow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28098</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Automation Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft Media Center Vs Apple FrontRow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28098</guid>
		<description>[...] Om Malik summarizes the general discussion in this post of his. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik summarizes the general discussion in this post of his. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; FrontRow, One More Time</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28097</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; FrontRow, One More Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28097</guid>
		<description>[...] I admit I have overdosed on the whole Front Row thing, but then I am often accused of pooh-poohing everything, so perhaps when I like something, well I like it. My previous two posts, I Want My Front Row-TV and Microsoft Media Center Vs Apple Front Row have generated some talk. Charlie Owen, who is part of the media center team posed a few questions as he counter-punched. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I admit I have overdosed on the whole Front Row thing, but then I am often accused of pooh-poohing everything, so perhaps when I like something, well I like it. My previous two posts, I Want My Front Row-TV and Microsoft Media Center Vs Apple Front Row have generated some talk. Charlie Owen, who is part of the media center team posed a few questions as he counter-punched. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarvesh&#8217;s Blog &#187; Om takes on Microsoft Media Center Vs Apple FrontRow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28096</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarvesh&#8217;s Blog &#187; Om takes on Microsoft Media Center Vs Apple FrontRow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28096</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting read  http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting read   (<a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28095</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28095</guid>
		<description>Apologies for the broken URL. The comment posting system seemed to remove the '_' characters in the URL I pasted.

You can read the article by going directly to our blog.

http://blog.brightcove.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for the broken URL. The comment posting system seemed to remove the &#8216;_&#8217; characters in the URL I pasted.</p>
<p>You can read the article by going directly to our blog.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://blog.brightcove.com/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28094</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/23/microsoft-media-center-vs-apple-frontrow/#comment-28094</guid>
		<description>Recently on the Brightcove blog (http://blog.brightcove.com/) I posted my thgoughts on the possible relationship between the iPod &#38; FrontRow vs Media Center.

If a varient of FrontRow could be run from the iPod that could provide a very simple and compelling solution for most consumers. Get rid of the difficulties of the home network, by using the more reliable human-powered network.

Download to PC, sync to iPod, watch on TV.

http://blog.brightcove.com/blog/2005/10/ipod_frontrow_v.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently on the Brightcove blog (http://blog.brightcove.com/) I posted my thgoughts on the possible relationship between the iPod &amp; FrontRow vs Media Center.</p>
<p>If a varient of FrontRow could be run from the iPod that could provide a very simple and compelling solution for most consumers. Get rid of the difficulties of the home network, by using the more reliable human-powered network.</p>
<p>Download to PC, sync to iPod, watch on TV.</p>
<p> (<a href="http://blog.brightcove.com/blog/2005/10/ipod_frontrow_v.html" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
