<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics of San Francisco WiFi Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karakeando por la Web &#187; Madrid subvenciona para más Internet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-837191</link>
		<dc:creator>Karakeando por la Web &#187; Madrid subvenciona para más Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-837191</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] crear un espacio amplio de acceso al Internet y, por qué no, un Madrid cubierto por WiFi. Si lo puede hacer San Franciso, por qué no Madrid, aunque el proyecto de los estadounidenses es iniciativa de la empresa privada, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crear un espacio amplio de acceso al Internet y, por qué no, un Madrid cubierto por WiFi. Si lo puede hacer San Franciso, por qué no Madrid, aunque el proyecto de los estadounidenses es iniciativa de la empresa privada, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madrid subvenciona para más Internet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-835012</link>
		<dc:creator>Madrid subvenciona para más Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-835012</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] crear un espacio amplio de acceso al Internet y, por qué no, un Madrid cubierto por WiFi. Si lo puede hacer San Franciso, por qué no Madrid, aunque el proyecto de los estadounidenses es iniciativa de la empresa privada, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] crear un espacio amplio de acceso al Internet y, por qué no, un Madrid cubierto por WiFi. Si lo puede hacer San Franciso, por qué no Madrid, aunque el proyecto de los estadounidenses es iniciativa de la empresa privada, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Wifi Sometimes Really is Free : Venture Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26079</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Wifi Sometimes Really is Free : Venture Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26079</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the Board of Supervisors in San Francisco keeps arguing about who should own the free wifi network that Google and Earthlink are offering to build for all the residents of the City, and subsequently [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Board of Supervisors in San Francisco keeps arguing about who should own the free wifi network that Google and Earthlink are offering to build for all the residents of the City, and subsequently [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Earthlink, Google Team On SF WiFi Net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26078</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Earthlink, Google Team On SF WiFi Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The two companies will share the cost of construction and operational expenses. To clarify, this is just a proposal, and not a done deal. The City has asked for proposals back in November 2005. The San Francisco Wireless project has been a politically tough effort, and I wonder how long it will take before the city does get unwired. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The two companies will share the cost of construction and operational expenses. To clarify, this is just a proposal, and not a done deal. The City has asked for proposals back in November 2005. The San Francisco Wireless project has been a politically tough effort, and I wonder how long it will take before the city does get unwired. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maajorly shadymax arbit fundaes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Municipal Wi-fi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26077</link>
		<dc:creator>Maajorly shadymax arbit fundaes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Municipal Wi-fi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26077</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Many American cities- San Francisco is the most well known example, but Philadelphia and some others are also planning it- are planning to roll out free wireless broadband networks covering the entire city. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many American cities- San Francisco is the most well known example, but Philadelphia and some others are also planning it- are planning to roll out free wireless broadband networks covering the entire city. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five on SF Wireless Short List</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26076</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five on SF Wireless Short List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26076</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] It is interesting to see Skytel/MCI, a company that is essentially owned by Verizon in the mix. Nothing like a little Bell system infighting. I think this would be fun on to track. Kimo reminds us that there will be a public hearing tomorrow at 2 pm noon in the City Hall. More on the politics of SF Tech Connect. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is interesting to see Skytel/MCI, a company that is essentially owned by Verizon in the mix. Nothing like a little Bell system infighting. I think this would be fun on to track. Kimo reminds us that there will be a public hearing tomorrow at 2 pm noon in the City Hall. More on the politics of SF Tech Connect. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kari</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26075</link>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26075</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the public proposal information is incomplete because the city will not disclose proprietary information. For example, only 10 pages of the 50-page Google response were non-proprietary.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the public proposal information is incomplete because the city will not disclose proprietary information. For example, only 10 pages of the 50-page Google response were non-proprietary.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denken Über &#187; FON, redes Muni-Fi y el mundo sin cables</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26074</link>
		<dc:creator>Denken Über &#187; FON, redes Muni-Fi y el mundo sin cables</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26074</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] La competencia interesante que puede aparecer en su horizonte son las redes Muni-Fi que se están viendo cada día con más intensidad; como siempre, en Estados Unidos primero, por ejemplo la Ciudad de Philadelfia y el contrato con Earthlink o el proyecto de Milwaukee , o Winsconsin o el famoso plan de Google en San Francisco donde, se habla desde costo 0 hasta cifras específicas de u$s20 mensuales por acceso ubicuo. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] La competencia interesante que puede aparecer en su horizonte son las redes Muni-Fi que se están viendo cada día con más intensidad; como siempre, en Estados Unidos primero, por ejemplo la Ciudad de Philadelfia y el contrato con Earthlink o el proyecto de Milwaukee , o Winsconsin o el famoso plan de Google en San Francisco donde, se habla desde costo 0 hasta cifras específicas de u$s20 mensuales por acceso ubicuo. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26073</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fleishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26073</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wish I did -- I only know of the engineering proposal&#039;s &lt;em&gt;existence&lt;/em&gt; but haven&#039;t seen it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I did &#8212; I only know of the engineering proposal&#8217;s <em>existence</em> but haven&#8217;t seen it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ftth</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26072</link>
		<dc:creator>ftth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26072</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;competition would be good for san francisco.  might push sbc to fiber the city and complete with free wireless by offering better services&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>competition would be good for san francisco.  might push sbc to fiber the city and complete with free wireless by offering better services</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson West</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26071</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, Glenn, any chance you have a copy of that?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Glenn, any chance you have a copy of that?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26070</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fleishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/politics-of-san-francisco-wifi-project/#comment-26070</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You wrote, &quot;One of the many things that Google’s response didn’t address would be the handling of traffic backhaul, fiber and wireless point to multipoint redundancy and whether they would use a distribute mesh network design.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Their engineering proposal wasn&#039;t included in the released information. They did submit one. Other companies chose to redact; it seems Google chose to omit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote, &#8220;One of the many things that Google’s response didn’t address would be the handling of traffic backhaul, fiber and wireless point to multipoint redundancy and whether they would use a distribute mesh network design.&#8221;</p>

<p>Their engineering proposal wasn&#8217;t included in the released information. They did submit one. Other companies chose to redact; it seems Google chose to omit.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
