<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: inform.com launches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26062</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if you would visit the site http://motions.sytes.net or 10000 other similar sites which, automatically detect the installed plug-ins on the remote clients your anti virus would alert that the site is infected with JS/Wonka which is not definitely true!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is simply no other way to detect installed plug-ins on the remote clients without using JavaScript.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would recommend to find yourself a better anti-virus software and not such a cheep one which, could differ between those cases.
One day, may wisdom defeat ignorance :))&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you would visit the site <a href="http://motions.sytes.net" rel="nofollow">http://motions.sytes.net</a> or 10000 other similar sites which, automatically detect the installed plug-ins on the remote clients your anti virus would alert that the site is infected with JS/Wonka which is not definitely true!</p>

<p>There is simply no other way to detect installed plug-ins on the remote clients without using JavaScript.</p>

<p>I would recommend to find yourself a better anti-virus software and not such a cheep one which, could differ between those cases.
One day, may wisdom defeat ignorance :))</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26061</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26061</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How novel - an open beta in 2005 that doesn&#039;t use Ajax! Maybe they are going for a retro kind of Y2K look and feel? I had a quick look, but found it too awful to persevere. I still have no clear idea of what makes them &quot;better&quot; than other news monitors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How novel &#8211; an open beta in 2005 that doesn&#8217;t use Ajax! Maybe they are going for a retro kind of Y2K look and feel? I had a quick look, but found it too awful to persevere. I still have no clear idea of what makes them &#8220;better&#8221; than other news monitors.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogvp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking Inform.com For a Spin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26060</link>
		<dc:creator>blogvp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Taking Inform.com For a Spin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26060</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] UPDATE: I was right, even Om and Business 2.0 agree that inform.com is not impressive. It&#8217;s a good feeling to be validated like that by &#8220;higher authority&#8221;.    Posted at 6:05 pm in: Blog Readers [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: I was right, even Om and Business 2.0 agree that inform.com is not impressive. It&#8217;s a good feeling to be validated like that by &#8220;higher authority&#8221;.    Posted at 6:05 pm in: Blog Readers [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Dog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/informcom-launches/#comment-26059</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to mention that it uses JS. Wonka javascript as detection, which is considered to be a possible malicious virus by pretty much every antivirus company. And they open the window without toolbars or any browser navigation available -- bad form!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that it uses JS. Wonka javascript as detection, which is considered to be a possible malicious virus by pretty much every antivirus company. And they open the window without toolbars or any browser navigation available &#8212; bad form!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
