2 Comments

Summary:

The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog has this post, where they ask, “Peer-To-Peer: What Is It Good For?” And then answer – absolutely nothing! Actually it is a pretty thoughtful piece, despite the blood-boiling headline. via Wes

The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog has this post, where they ask, “Peer-To-Peer: What Is It Good For?” And then answer – absolutely nothing! Actually it is a pretty thoughtful piece, despite the blood-boiling headline. via Wes

  1. The essay is unfortunately titled pretty confusingly, given the fact that the author says in the comments – “not generalized p2p design issues, but distribution of broad-interest content”.

    If that is what you meant, say that, *in* the post!

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post