<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3G Will Make 2006 Mobile Blockbuster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/#comment-109123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/#comment-109123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Brown might be too conservative. I could see services take off at $50 if 2 things happen: you can get that price unbundled from voice and networks are ugraded to support better uplink throughput and better latency. Of course, carriers might prefer to make $70-80/month from voice + data than $50/month from a standalone data plan that supported VoIP, so I can see where Brown is coming from. It&#039;s just that, if carriers keep fighting real 3G the way the ILECs fight naked DSL, they continue to drive the demand for municipal broadband. Greed is only good if you can keep the monopoly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Brown might be too conservative. I could see services take off at $50 if 2 things happen: you can get that price unbundled from voice and networks are ugraded to support better uplink throughput and better latency. Of course, carriers might prefer to make $70-80/month from voice + data than $50/month from a standalone data plan that supported VoIP, so I can see where Brown is coming from. It&#8217;s just that, if carriers keep fighting real 3G the way the ILECs fight naked DSL, they continue to drive the demand for municipal broadband. Greed is only good if you can keep the monopoly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony E</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/#comment-109122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/#comment-109122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve noticed the talk about HSDPA gaining momentum, so it looks like 2006 will be a new start for 3g service around the world, after a pretty weak existance to date.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the talk about HSDPA gaining momentum, so it looks like 2006 will be a new start for 3g service around the world, after a pretty weak existance to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kernel Mustard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/#comment-109121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kernel Mustard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 03:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/10/09/3g-will-make-2006-mobile-blockbuster/#comment-109121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Blogs I Read&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogs I Read</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

