<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Now Real Estate vertical search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brainerd Realtor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-953073</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainerd Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-953073</guid>
		<description>I had never heard NY has no MLS system in place. That is insane. Google maps was a big discussion at the Google SXC west this past weekend. 

I also agree with Rick Ho, #5 gEarth INt. is really a cool tool to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never heard NY has no MLS system in place. That is insane. Google maps was a big discussion at the Google SXC west this past weekend. </p>
<p>I also agree with Rick Ho, #5 gEarth INt. is really a cool tool to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-923802</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-923802</guid>
		<description>Wow, the good old days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the good old days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalpa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25200</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;www.urbanregistry.com? Has anyone heard of this NY-centric website launched silently last month? The beta version carries thousands of &quot;for sale&quot; listings and thirty thousand  &quot;rental&quot;  listings on the website. The largest numbers are in Manhattan and Brooklyn. There are some in Queens, several in Staten Island as well, and the Bronx not left behind. Numerous rentals throw out an error message, but the way the rental market is in NYC, it&#039;s not surprising. The data could do with some clean up, but it&#039;s getting there, so users won&#039;t see error messages. Take a look. Besides, currently there&#039;s no sign-up required.  [Will this appear, if it&#039;s not filtered, in bold! Hope not] Thanks, Om. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(By the way, I&#039;m not sure why the font here is in extra bold)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.urbanregistry.com?" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbanregistry.com?</a> Has anyone heard of this NY-centric website launched silently last month? The beta version carries thousands of &#8220;for sale&#8221; listings and thirty thousand  &#8220;rental&#8221;  listings on the website. The largest numbers are in Manhattan and Brooklyn. There are some in Queens, several in Staten Island as well, and the Bronx not left behind. Numerous rentals throw out an error message, but the way the rental market is in NYC, it&#8217;s not surprising. The data could do with some clean up, but it&#8217;s getting there, so users won&#8217;t see error messages. Take a look. Besides, currently there&#8217;s no sign-up required.  [Will this appear, if it's not filtered, in bold! Hope not] Thanks, Om. </p>
<p>(By the way, I&#8217;m not sure why the font here is in extra bold)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ho</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25199</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tight Google map integration is definitely the trend of the next gen real estate search engine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take a look at http://www.housingrobots.com  In additional to what Trulia is providing, they have a couple of unique features that I can&#039;t find in similar sites.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1)  &quot;SCHOOL-FIRST&quot; search where buyer can have an overview of top school districts and start from there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2) &quot;PRICE-HISTORY&quot; tracking, so you see all the price changes of the houses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3) &quot;SURROUNDING&quot; info.  They provide surrounding schools, restaurants, church and bank info for their listed house.  Very handy. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;4) Their Google Map integration is very well done.  All the nearby cities will be updated when you move around.  Unlike Trulia which give an approximation at high zoom level, their housing information is accurate at all zoom level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;5) I also like their Google Earth integration&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Take a look to see if you like it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rgds, Ricky&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tight Google map integration is definitely the trend of the next gen real estate search engine.</p>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.housingrobots.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.housingrobots.com</a>  In additional to what Trulia is providing, they have a couple of unique features that I can&#8217;t find in similar sites.</p>
<p>1)  &#8220;SCHOOL-FIRST&#8221; search where buyer can have an overview of top school districts and start from there.</p>
<p>2) &#8220;PRICE-HISTORY&#8221; tracking, so you see all the price changes of the houses.</p>
<p>3) &#8220;SURROUNDING&#8221; info.  They provide surrounding schools, restaurants, church and bank info for their listed house.  Very handy. </p>
<p>4) Their Google Map integration is very well done.  All the nearby cities will be updated when you move around.  Unlike Trulia which give an approximation at high zoom level, their housing information is accurate at all zoom level.</p>
<p>5) I also like their Google Earth integration</p>
<p>Take a look to see if you like it.</p>
<p>Rgds, Ricky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Fischman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25198</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Fischman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 04:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25198</guid>
		<description>Trulia is an Interesting site however i must mention that i came across a great New York City based real estate site called CityCrybs.com. It seems like it is not a vertical site yet a comprehensive classifieds site with a diverse selection of properties listed by local agents and landlords. Lots of pictures and also google maps for each customized search. Check it out www.citycrybs.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trulia is an Interesting site however i must mention that i came across a great New York City based real estate site called CityCrybs.com. It seems like it is not a vertical site yet a comprehensive classifieds site with a diverse selection of properties listed by local agents and landlords. Lots of pictures and also google maps for each customized search. Check it out <a href="http://www.citycrybs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.citycrybs.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Web 2.0 Exit&#8230; what is that?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25197</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Web 2.0 Exit&#8230; what is that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25197</guid>
		<description>[...] I am at the Search SIG down in Mountain View listening to the founders of some of the new vertical search engines including Healthline, Simply Hired, Trulia and Truveo. There were nearly 20% people in the room who were building search engines. When I asked these panelists whose search engines are basically are scraping other sites, cannibalizing the folks that provide the &#8220;content&#8221; for their sites, what was their exit strategy? Answer - dead silence. I was saying this earlier in the day, on this Web 2.0 highway, there are three exits: Microsoft, Yahoo and Google. And that simply sums up the single biggest problem with Web 2.0. Niall says Google mentioned every five minutes! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am at the Search SIG down in Mountain View listening to the founders of some of the new vertical search engines including Healthline, Simply Hired, Trulia and Truveo. There were nearly 20% people in the room who were building search engines. When I asked these panelists whose search engines are basically are scraping other sites, cannibalizing the folks that provide the &#8220;content&#8221; for their sites, what was their exit strategy? Answer &#8211; dead silence. I was saying this earlier in the day, on this Web 2.0 highway, there are three exits: Microsoft, Yahoo and Google. And that simply sums up the single biggest problem with Web 2.0. Niall says Google mentioned every five minutes! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25196</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25196</guid>
		<description>for NYC real estate search take a look at</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for NYC real estate search take a look at</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25195</link>
		<dc:creator>rdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 23:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25195</guid>
		<description>sorry for the double post.....wasn&#039;t sure the first one went through...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the double post&#8230;..wasn&#8217;t sure the first one went through&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25194</link>
		<dc:creator>TG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25194</guid>
		<description>This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/17/business/17realtor.ready.html?ex=1128225600&amp;en=5a1c2efac173dc7f&amp;ei=5070&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NYT article&lt;/a&gt; mentions some of the MLS situation in NYC if anyone&#039;s interested. Finding housing in NYC totally sucks unless you&#039;ve got money to burn.

[does Wordpress have no comment preview out of the box or does everyone turn it off? why?]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/17/business/17realtor.ready.html?ex=1128225600&amp;en=5a1c2efac173dc7f&amp;ei=5070" rel="nofollow">NYT article</a> mentions some of the MLS situation in NYC if anyone&#8217;s interested. Finding housing in NYC totally sucks unless you&#8217;ve got money to burn.</p>
<p>[does WordPress have no comment preview out of the box or does everyone turn it off? why?]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah R</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25193</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25193</guid>
		<description>John C,

Great pad it is! Its incredible to me how pricey Tribeca is, although at about $1200/Sq. Ft., this condo doesnt seem that overpriced.

I am a real estate agent with Citi-Habitats, focusing on residential sales.  It is a shame that New Yorkers either have to contact a broker, or sift through 15-10 websites to find good listings.

Was going to start www.urbandigs.com as a real estate search engine to solve that problem, with the same search technology as another site I started, www.hotspothaven.com (wifi access finder). But, it was going to be way too expensive, and now that I see Trulia, dont know if I can beat that!

As a broker, I use Corcoran&#039;s TAXI system to find listings for my clients. Its fantastic, but as you say, there is nothing out there in the public domain for New York apartment hunters.

If I can ever help you find something here in NYC, dont hesitate to contact me and I will do my best to help!!

Have you considered DUMBO, Brooklyn or new constructions? The tax abatement on new developments gives you savings on monthly, but usually with higher purchase prices. Look at www.70washington.com, in DUMBO. Great building!

Noah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John C,</p>
<p>Great pad it is! Its incredible to me how pricey Tribeca is, although at about $1200/Sq. Ft., this condo doesnt seem that overpriced.</p>
<p>I am a real estate agent with Citi-Habitats, focusing on residential sales.  It is a shame that New Yorkers either have to contact a broker, or sift through 15-10 websites to find good listings.</p>
<p>Was going to start <a href="http://www.urbandigs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandigs.com</a> as a real estate search engine to solve that problem, with the same search technology as another site I started, <a href="http://www.hotspothaven.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hotspothaven.com</a> (wifi access finder). But, it was going to be way too expensive, and now that I see Trulia, dont know if I can beat that!</p>
<p>As a broker, I use Corcoran&#8217;s TAXI system to find listings for my clients. Its fantastic, but as you say, there is nothing out there in the public domain for New York apartment hunters.</p>
<p>If I can ever help you find something here in NYC, dont hesitate to contact me and I will do my best to help!!</p>
<p>Have you considered DUMBO, Brooklyn or new constructions? The tax abatement on new developments gives you savings on monthly, but usually with higher purchase prices. Look at <a href="http://www.70washington.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.70washington.com</a>, in DUMBO. Great building!</p>
<p>Noah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Ho</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25192</link>
		<dc:creator>F Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25192</guid>
		<description>Even if someone gives it to me for free, I still cannot afford to live in it!  Think property tax, and to lesser extents insurance and maintenace.

Will I be enjoying my time there?  Only if I have someone cleaning toilets, windows, vacuuming and doing other household chores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if someone gives it to me for free, I still cannot afford to live in it!  Think property tax, and to lesser extents insurance and maintenace.</p>
<p>Will I be enjoying my time there?  Only if I have someone cleaning toilets, windows, vacuuming and doing other household chores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconBeat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25191</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25191</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A new housing site. Oh, and Dogster may be profitable!&lt;/strong&gt;

Jeff Clavier, a Silicon Valley consultant and investor, points to some noteworthy local news: (1) There&#039;s Trulia, which is a new Google Maps mashup with real estate listings. (2) Dogster and Catster, of San Francisco, are beginning to make money. (3) ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A new housing site. Oh, and Dogster may be profitable!</strong></p>
<p>Jeff Clavier, a Silicon Valley consultant and investor, points to some noteworthy local news: (1) There&#8217;s Trulia, which is a new Google Maps mashup with real estate listings. (2) Dogster and Catster, of San Francisco, are beginning to make money. (3) &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25190</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25190</guid>
		<description>Actually, the reason it doesn&#039;t work in NYC is that there is no multiple listing service (MLS) which virtually every other city has - a way to ensure that brokers are not disintermediated. As a New Yorker, it is very sad as one has to troll through about 25 sites to get a reasonable sense of inventory.

BTW, check out this pad!

http://striblingny.com/propinfo.asp?webid=949456&amp;type=SALE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the reason it doesn&#8217;t work in NYC is that there is no multiple listing service (MLS) which virtually every other city has &#8211; a way to ensure that brokers are not disintermediated. As a New Yorker, it is very sad as one has to troll through about 25 sites to get a reasonable sense of inventory.</p>
<p>BTW, check out this pad!</p>
<p><a href="http://striblingny.com/propinfo.asp?webid=949456&amp;type=SALE" rel="nofollow">http://striblingny.com/propinfo.asp?webid=949456&amp;type=SALE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25189</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25189</guid>
		<description>i agree... but then when i have the house, i will worry about that.. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree&#8230; but then when i have the house, i will worry about that.. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Clavier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25188</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Clavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/28/and-now-real-estate-vertical-search/#comment-25188</guid>
		<description>You sure you want to bother cleaning up that size of a pool. Trust me, it is a pain :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sure you want to bother cleaning up that size of a pool. Trust me, it is a pain :-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
