<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moto should learn from Nano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed Marwen Meddah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohamed Marwen Meddah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree about the UI. I hate Motorola phones because of their UI, it totally sucks!
No matter how cool some models may look, just the thought that I&#039;ll have to face that ugly and unusable UI, always turned me off Moto phones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree about the UI. I hate Motorola phones because of their UI, it totally sucks!<br />
No matter how cool some models may look, just the thought that I&#8217;ll have to face that ugly and unusable UI, always turned me off Moto phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nokia&#039;s UI has always been head and shoulders above Motorola. Has it gone South in the past year? I&#039;ve seen nothing to make me think Motorola has improved in that span.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia&#8217;s UI has always been head and shoulders above Motorola. Has it gone South in the past year? I&#8217;ve seen nothing to make me think Motorola has improved in that span.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tec</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RAZR is wide, but THIN!  This embodies a large LCD sceen.  As a user of Nokia, NEC and Motorola, the UI is fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RAZR is wide, but THIN!  This embodies a large LCD sceen.  As a user of Nokia, NEC and Motorola, the UI is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Chronicles by Jeff Nolan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venture Chronicles by Jeff Nolan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Moto NoNo&lt;/strong&gt;

In a comment to my earlier post Ben indicated that the comment by Zander was made in jest... bet Ed&#039;s not laughing now. Link: Moto should learn from Nano. However, I think there is something Moto should learn from Apple:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Moto NoNo</strong></p>
<p>In a comment to my earlier post Ben indicated that the comment by Zander was made in jest&#8230; bet Ed&#8217;s not laughing now. Link: Moto should learn from Nano. However, I think there is something Moto should learn from Apple:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/26/moto-should-learn-from-nano/#comment-108298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moto does seem to get stuck on admiring their work. My black StarTac was slick during its day, but then its day kept going, and going, and going. A long while till they really worked to update/replace it if I recall correctly. They definitely need to remember to look away from the mirror.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moto does seem to get stuck on admiring their work. My black StarTac was slick during its day, but then its day kept going, and going, and going. A long while till they really worked to update/replace it if I recall correctly. They definitely need to remember to look away from the mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

