<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSN, AOL doesn&#8217;t mean 1+1=11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; AOL Belle of The Ball?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; AOL Belle of The Ball?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Carl Icahn, the great pillager of airlines, seems to have it for Time Warner. The corporate raider who is as savvy about the post-broadband landscape as David Hasselhof is about rap music, wants Time Warner to sell off its cable assets, and get rid of AOL. Never mind that his last effort at such meddling didn&#8217;t go down so well. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carl Icahn, the great pillager of airlines, seems to have it for Time Warner. The corporate raider who is as savvy about the post-broadband landscape as David Hasselhof is about rap music, wants Time Warner to sell off its cable assets, and get rid of AOL. Never mind that his last effort at such meddling didn&#8217;t go down so well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Seng's Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Seng's Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 03:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;VoN Bloggers Roundtable&lt;/strong&gt;

Just arrived Boston to participate at the]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>VoN Bloggers Roundtable</strong></p>
<p>Just arrived Boston to participate at the</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; What&#8217;s Up At Microsoft!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; What&#8217;s Up At Microsoft!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 00:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Despite all these problems, I am loathe to bet against Microsoft. They just have too much money. Like the Yankees, you can never count them out. Here is a good example that the wolf still lurks under sheep&#8217;s clothing. The AOL-MSN deal, harks back to the blatantly predatory days where company arm-twisted computer makers to bundle a sub-par browser. Take away 12% of Google&#8217;s Ad-revenues, and you have wounded the upstart. Clearly a business win, because on technology they can&#8217;t! I think Microsoft can use its &#8220;mountains of cash&#8221; to pose problems for any rival, without any chance of admonishment from the regulators. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Despite all these problems, I am loathe to bet against Microsoft. They just have too much money. Like the Yankees, you can never count them out. Here is a good example that the wolf still lurks under sheep&#8217;s clothing. The AOL-MSN deal, harks back to the blatantly predatory days where company arm-twisted computer makers to bundle a sub-par browser. Take away 12% of Google&#8217;s Ad-revenues, and you have wounded the upstart. Clearly a business win, because on technology they can&#8217;t! I think Microsoft can use its &#8220;mountains of cash&#8221; to pose problems for any rival, without any chance of admonishment from the regulators. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karthik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 05:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If msft manages to convince AOL to use msn search instead of google, it equates to a 12% revenue drop for google. AOL was the single largest revenue source for google last year when google declared their earnings.  Battle royal is in the offing between msft and google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If msft manages to convince AOL to use msn search instead of google, it equates to a 12% revenue drop for google. AOL was the single largest revenue source for google last year when google declared their earnings.  Battle royal is in the offing between msft and google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Varghese</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Varghese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/15/msn-aol-doesnt-mean-1111/#comment-107930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Om,

If the price is right, wouldn&#039;t it be good move for MSN to tap into the 50 million + AIM/AOL users?

AOL seems to have been spending a good deal of money on content lately.

Would this purchase be a better move for Yahoo?

p.s.  Great blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,</p>
<p>If the price is right, wouldn&#8217;t it be good move for MSN to tap into the 50 million + AIM/AOL users?</p>
<p>AOL seems to have been spending a good deal of money on content lately.</p>
<p>Would this purchase be a better move for Yahoo?</p>
<p>p.s.  Great blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

