Vote for GigaOM

Om Malik | Friday, September 9, 2005 | 2:25 PM PT | 16 comments

Okay vanity takes over - Business Week is having best of the web poll and I am against some heavy hitters in the tech-sites @ Work Category. I mean up against News.com, Slashdot, Digg, and O’Reilly Radar. Not even have a prayer, but hopefully all of you can at least help me put up a decent showing. Here is the link to cast your vote.

2 trackbacks so far

September 11th, 2005
11:06 PM PT

When best intentions turn into LinkedIn spam

I’m usually quite a proponent of LinkedIn, as readers of my weblog are aware, but I find it quite fascinating that the desire to have the LinkedIn site ranked highly in an influential BusinessWeek Best Of the Web poll is showing a bit of the seamy und…

September 11th, 2005
11:17 PM PT

LinkedIn + BusinessWeek poll = connection spam?

I’m usually quite a proponent of LinkedIn, as readers of my weblog are aware, but I find it quite fascinating that the desire to have the LinkedIn site ranked highly in an influential BusinessWeek Best Of the Web poll is…

14 comments so far

September 9th, 2005
2:53 PM PT

done

September 9th, 2005
3:05 PM PT
Raghav Gupta said:

looking good so far…

September 9th, 2005
3:13 PM PT
jeeves said:

done. Good luck Om.

September 9th, 2005
4:07 PM PT

done! good luck :)

September 9th, 2005
5:08 PM PT
Jeff Clavier said:

Take a snapshot of the result page, you’re miles ahead at the moment :-).

September 9th, 2005
6:54 PM PT
Allen Tsai said:

You’ve got my vote. Good luck Om.

September 9th, 2005
9:53 PM PT
Charlie Sierra said:

Hold on there cowboy!!!

If news.com gets half its stories from reading your site, then how can they even be in the contest?

Opps, nevermind. I forget this is: America.
tic.

September 10th, 2005
10:35 AM PT

I voted for you my friend…and did a write in for my site :-)

By the way, your winning so far.

September 10th, 2005
11:04 AM PT
Rob Hof said:

Om,

There appears to be widespread confusion about the nature of this online survey, and by now I have to admit the fault is at least partly ours for not making things clear. The online survey, admittedly unscientific, is just what it is: what readers think (including readers who have been asked by site operators to vote for them–hey, we didn’t say you can’t campaign!). There won’t be “winners” per se, because we’re just going to tally up votes and lay out the results.

We’re also doing an entirely separate, more select list of editors’ picks because, well, we think that kind of judgment is one thing readers pay us to do. Reader votes won’t necessarily have any impact on that, partly because we know the survey is unscientific, partly because we also want to highlight the very best, and especially these days, those can be ones not everybody has heard about.

Anyway, good luck either way!

September 10th, 2005
11:09 AM PT
Brian Sugar said:

Done.

September 10th, 2005
12:49 PM PT
Om Malik said:

hey guys, thanks for the love. appreciate it.

September 10th, 2005
12:49 PM PT
Om Malik said:

rob,

thanks for the clarification. still, honored to be included in the list. but i appreciate you coming here and clarifying things for us.

Happy to vote for you, although frankly Slashdot and Techdirt are pretty darn good outfits. I also wrote in DSLReports.com, a dramaic example of ood reporting combined with what we now call citizen journalism. That site has more solid information on UJ.S. broadband than anyone else.

a1tech said:

Om,
You have our vote. You seem to have a solid lead so far. We read and appereciate your blog and wish you the best.

best

(link)

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Editorial Masthead

Carolyn Pritchard
Managing Editor
Celeste LeCompte
Special Projects Editor
Om Malik
Senior Writer
Stacey Higginbotham
Staff Writer
Wagner James Au
Contributing Editor
Liz Gannes
Staff Writer
Chris Albrecht
Staff Writer
Katie Fehrenbacher
Staff Writer
Josie Garthwaite
Staff Writer
Close
E-mail It