<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guessing Google&#8217;s VoIP Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pay Per Play</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-760559</link>
		<dc:creator>Pay Per Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-760559</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this will put pay per call, cpa, adsense out of business or at least give it a run for it&#039;s money. It&#039;s called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audioppp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pay Per Play&lt;/a&gt; and is the newest form of online advertising giving webmasters the opportunity to generate revenue from their websites with one BIG difference.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You get paid for EVERY visitor that visits and they don&#039;t even have to click on any ads or anything. All webmasters have to do is insert a piece of java script code like adsense, and when visitors enter a page that has the code, a five second audio is played automatically and the webmaster gets paid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this is going to be the biggest thing since adsense exploded onto the scene because the advertisers that are lined up to start advertising are huge multi nation corporations that will be bidding per play to have their audio played on your site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a new concept and all websites are being accepted with the exception of adult, hate or any other unethical topical websites. If you are interested in signing up, visit http://www.audioppp.com and fill out the form. It only takes about 2 minutes and most are automatically accepted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t how long automatic acceptance will last so go there know and register while you can. I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audioppp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pay per play&lt;/a&gt; will be huge and you will be doing yourself a huge disservice neglecting it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Goto http://www.audioppp.com now!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will put pay per call, cpa, adsense out of business or at least give it a run for it&#8217;s money. It&#8217;s called <a href="http://www.audioppp.com/" rel="nofollow">Pay Per Play</a> and is the newest form of online advertising giving webmasters the opportunity to generate revenue from their websites with one BIG difference.</p>

<p>You get paid for EVERY visitor that visits and they don&#8217;t even have to click on any ads or anything. All webmasters have to do is insert a piece of java script code like adsense, and when visitors enter a page that has the code, a five second audio is played automatically and the webmaster gets paid.</p>

<p>I think this is going to be the biggest thing since adsense exploded onto the scene because the advertisers that are lined up to start advertising are huge multi nation corporations that will be bidding per play to have their audio played on your site.</p>

<p>This is a new concept and all websites are being accepted with the exception of adult, hate or any other unethical topical websites. If you are interested in signing up, visit <a href="http://www.audioppp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.audioppp.com</a> and fill out the form. It only takes about 2 minutes and most are automatically accepted.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t how long automatic acceptance will last so go there know and register while you can. I think <a href="http://www.audioppp.com/" rel="nofollow">pay per play</a> will be huge and you will be doing yourself a huge disservice neglecting it.</p>

<p>Goto <a href="http://www.audioppp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.audioppp.com</a> now!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 360 view</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-471165</link>
		<dc:creator>360 view</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-471165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;would love to see true VOIP service from Google -- as they now how to manage information i.e. convenience would be at its best.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would love to see true VOIP service from Google &#8212; as they now how to manage information i.e. convenience would be at its best.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earn money calling!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23685</link>
		<dc:creator>Earn money calling!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23685</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do you spend lots of money calling? TelExtreme will change your life! Earn money calling! Visit: http://www.telextreme.1br.net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you spend lots of money calling? TelExtreme will change your life! Earn money calling! Visit: <a href="http://www.telextreme.1br.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.telextreme.1br.net</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Munoz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23683</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Munoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 01:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23683</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Who can explain the relationship with VOIP, Inc. Voice one, etc and their beta with google from earlier this year. These guys are techno inventors, have all the stuff ready to go. Could google want to buy them and therefore own their own voip company? Elaborate?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who can explain the relationship with VOIP, Inc. Voice one, etc and their beta with google from earlier this year. These guys are techno inventors, have all the stuff ready to go. Could google want to buy them and therefore own their own voip company? Elaborate?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eMarketPros - Websites, Search Engines &#38; SEO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seeing into Google&#8217;s Future</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23681</link>
		<dc:creator>eMarketPros - Websites, Search Engines &#38; SEO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seeing into Google&#8217;s Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The recent post on noted industry observer Om Malik&#8217;s blog sees a connection between Google&#8217;s plans for dark fiber and Wi-Fi, and the newly debuted Google Talk voice and IM chat application. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The recent post on noted industry observer Om Malik&#8217;s blog sees a connection between Google&#8217;s plans for dark fiber and Wi-Fi, and the newly debuted Google Talk voice and IM chat application. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik : &#187; Google Dials-In The AdWords</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23679</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik : &#187; Google Dials-In The AdWords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23679</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Google is finally testing out its Click-to-Call system. (Greg Yardley first reported this news, but I have been slow in getting around to it.) It has been a long time coming. I have been waiting for this since I wrote this piece in September. I believe this is the right strategy for the company to extend its core competence: attaching ads to anything that can be served up as a web-page. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google is finally testing out its Click-to-Call system. (Greg Yardley first reported this news, but I have been slow in getting around to it.) It has been a long time coming. I have been waiting for this since I wrote this piece in September. I believe this is the right strategy for the company to extend its core competence: attaching ads to anything that can be served up as a web-page. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedwick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23677</link>
		<dc:creator>tedwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23677</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;wow. you are prescient. &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.google.com/help/faq_clicktocall.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;google click-to-call&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;google&#039;s help section for advertisers for using something new: click-to-call. if someone wants to call the advertiser, google will connect them. sounds exactly like what you&#039;re talking about. they may not be doing away with pay-per-click, but they&#039;re certainly going into advertising over the phone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. you are prescient. <a HREF="http://www.google.com/help/faq_clicktocall.html" rel="nofollow">google click-to-call</a></p>

<p>google&#8217;s help section for advertisers for using something new: click-to-call. if someone wants to call the advertiser, google will connect them. sounds exactly like what you&#8217;re talking about. they may not be doing away with pay-per-click, but they&#8217;re certainly going into advertising over the phone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Yardley&#8217;s Internet Blog &#187; Google tests out Click-to-Call AdWords</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23675</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Yardley&#8217;s Internet Blog &#187; Google tests out Click-to-Call AdWords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 04:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23675</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] A lot of business implications here but at the moment that little evil part of me is thinking &#8216;great, a single form-field way to pester others with crank calls from advertisers at three in the morning.&#8217; Om Malik wrote about Google&#8217;s use of VoIP for commercial purposes back in September - I&#8217;m guessing the call made from Google to the lead (step 3 in the screenshots) is an early implementation of this. Of course Ingenio will be concerned - Google&#8217;s trying to eat their lunch.   google, pay-per-call, advertising, adwords  Posted by Greg Yardley @ 3:06 am [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A lot of business implications here but at the moment that little evil part of me is thinking &#8216;great, a single form-field way to pester others with crank calls from advertisers at three in the morning.&#8217; Om Malik wrote about Google&#8217;s use of VoIP for commercial purposes back in September &#8211; I&#8217;m guessing the call made from Google to the lead (step 3 in the screenshots) is an early implementation of this. Of course Ingenio will be concerned &#8211; Google&#8217;s trying to eat their lunch.   google, pay-per-call, advertising, adwords  Posted by Greg Yardley @ 3:06 am [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Live IM Makes Click To Call VoIP Real</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23673</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Live IM Makes Click To Call VoIP Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23673</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The click to call (via Teleo, I am guessing) married to the maps was brilliant. I mean wow! We were only discussing this yesterday on how to marry Google Maps, and Google Talk.  Microsoft KOs competition.Think of it as MSN messenger that got smarter, and then found a simpler-easier Friendster, a Plaxo, Intellisync client and well, a bag of chips. My hats off to the team that built Live IM client. It blows that it is not on a Mac. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The click to call (via Teleo, I am guessing) married to the maps was brilliant. I mean wow! We were only discussing this yesterday on how to marry Google Maps, and Google Talk.  Microsoft KOs competition.Think of it as MSN messenger that got smarter, and then found a simpler-easier Friendster, a Plaxo, Intellisync client and well, a bag of chips. My hats off to the team that built Live IM client. It blows that it is not on a Mac. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ÐšÐ»Ð¸ÐºÐ½Ð¸ Ñ€ÐµÐºÐ»Ð°Ð¼Ð°Ñ‚Ð° Ð¸ Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ñ€Ð¸ &#187; Ð¡Ñ‚Ñ€ÑƒÐ²Ð° Ñ?Ð¸!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23672</link>
		<dc:creator>ÐšÐ»Ð¸ÐºÐ½Ð¸ Ñ€ÐµÐºÐ»Ð°Ð¼Ð°Ñ‚Ð° Ð¸ Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ñ€Ð¸ &#187; Ð¡Ñ‚Ñ€ÑƒÐ²Ð° Ñ?Ð¸!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23672</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ð•Ð´Ð½Ð° Ð¸Ð½Ñ‚ÐµÑ€ÐµÑ?Ð½Ð° Ñ?Ð¿ÐµÐºÑƒÐ»Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ? Ð·Ð° Ð²ÑŠÐ·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¸Ñ‚Ðµ VoIP Ð¿Ð»Ð°Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ðµ Ð½Ð° Google. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Talk Business Model --
Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23671</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Talk Business Model --
Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] ness Model&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;                There has been an&nbsp;ongoing dialog (see Om Malik&#8217;s Guessing Google&#8217;s VoIP Plan, for instance) in the&nbsp;blogosphere o [...]
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ness Model&#8221;&gt;</p>

<pre><code>                There has been an&amp;nbsp;ongoing dialog (see Om Malik&amp;#8217;s Guessing Google&amp;#8217;s VoIP Plan, for instance) in the&amp;nbsp;blogosphere o [...]
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23669</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23669</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice post.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I wouldn&#039;t rule out pay per call as being part of the equation, I think this is about location-based advertising.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wifi calls also gives them a free location feed. This can be used to tap into the long tail of offline merchant advertsing, just as they&#039;ve exploited the long tail of online.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More at MobHappy http://mobhappy.typepad.com/russell_buckleys_mobhappy/2005/09/googles_big_ide.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(If the link doesn&#039;t work, search for Google&#039;s Big Idea).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d be intrigued to get your view.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Russell&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om</p>

<p>Nice post.</p>

<p>While I wouldn&#8217;t rule out pay per call as being part of the equation, I think this is about location-based advertising.</p>

<p>Wifi calls also gives them a free location feed. This can be used to tap into the long tail of offline merchant advertsing, just as they&#8217;ve exploited the long tail of online.</p>

<p>More at MobHappy <a href="http://mobhappy.typepad.com/russell_buckleys_mobhappy/2005/09/googles_big_ide.html" rel="nofollow">http://mobhappy.typepad.com/russell_buckleys_mobhappy/2005/09/googles_big_ide.html</a></p>

<p>(If the link doesn&#8217;t work, search for Google&#8217;s Big Idea).</p>

<p>I&#8217;d be intrigued to get your view.</p>

<p>Cheers</p>

<p>Russell</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anurag (Anu) Nigam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23668</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag (Anu) Nigam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23668</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please edit last comment...
&quot;I think you hit on it with the pay to call!&quot;
to
&quot;I think you hit on it with the click to call!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please edit last comment&#8230;
&#8220;I think you hit on it with the pay to call!&#8221;
to
&#8220;I think you hit on it with the click to call!&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anurag (Anu) Nigam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23667</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag (Anu) Nigam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How does a $82B grow without cutting into its base?
I think you hit on it with the pay to call!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this is the reason they are getting into print and also text messaging via dodgeball and google sms.  The person has to call up for the print to connect and they&#039;ll connect to the advertiser.  But they will provide a simple click with no need to enter a number for text messaging since they already have the person&#039;s cell number.  Now, if you take Google Talk with Skype, they can easily do click to call without a number for online ads also because they&#039;ll have the Skype number.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The click to call/VOIP method to connect with advertisers will be unifying factor as people are not searching.  They aren&#039;t killing their core base, but they are expanding into areas and growing into &quot;the place to advertise anywhere&quot;. The other reason to this is that they expand into other age demographics they normally may not get.  I think text messaging is going to be the age demographic for really young kids.   Print will go for much older people.  Also note that cell phones and print are two areas that diversifies them out of just having the PC be the only source to make money. They&#039;ll leverage the brand to grow into new mediums and age groups while retaining their core.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this idea work, they may well be the largest company in the world in a year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anurag (Anu) Nigam&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;PS.  I am biased because my company is in the text messaging space.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does a $82B grow without cutting into its base?
I think you hit on it with the pay to call!</p>

<p>I think this is the reason they are getting into print and also text messaging via dodgeball and google sms.  The person has to call up for the print to connect and they&#8217;ll connect to the advertiser.  But they will provide a simple click with no need to enter a number for text messaging since they already have the person&#8217;s cell number.  Now, if you take Google Talk with Skype, they can easily do click to call without a number for online ads also because they&#8217;ll have the Skype number.</p>

<p>The click to call/VOIP method to connect with advertisers will be unifying factor as people are not searching.  They aren&#8217;t killing their core base, but they are expanding into areas and growing into &#8220;the place to advertise anywhere&#8221;. The other reason to this is that they expand into other age demographics they normally may not get.  I think text messaging is going to be the age demographic for really young kids.   Print will go for much older people.  Also note that cell phones and print are two areas that diversifies them out of just having the PC be the only source to make money. They&#8217;ll leverage the brand to grow into new mediums and age groups while retaining their core.</p>

<p>If this idea work, they may well be the largest company in the world in a year.</p>

<p>Anurag (Anu) Nigam</p>

<p>PS.  I am biased because my company is in the text messaging space.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23666</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If it is true that voice is just an application in the world of Internet, then why would Pay per call be any more lucrative than Pay per click?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is true that voice is just an application in the world of Internet, then why would Pay per call be any more lucrative than Pay per click?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Battelle's Searchblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23664</link>
		<dc:creator>John Battelle's Searchblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/09/01/guessing-googles-voip-plan/#comment-23664</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Friday Links&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google expands Print into EU (Chirac mobilizes troops). Google goes Local in China (SEW) More Om on Google VoIP Technorati launches Blog Finder (and IceRocket has a new Linktracker (via Cuban), which seems like more work that I want to do...)...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Friday Links</strong></p>

<p>Google expands Print into EU (Chirac mobilizes troops). Google goes Local in China (SEW) More Om on Google VoIP Technorati launches Blog Finder (and IceRocket has a new Linktracker (via Cuban), which seems like more work that I want to do&#8230;)&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
