<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google WiFi, Take Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allen Tsai - Technology in Motion &#187; Google vs. Motorola - Is Google Getting into the Cell Phone Biz?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21346</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Tsai - Technology in Motion &#187; Google vs. Motorola - Is Google Getting into the Cell Phone Biz?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21346</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] ve even been reports Google has plans for purchasing tons of dark fiber in preparation for GoogleNet. Whether this is part of Google&#8217;s grand scheme, no one outside the GooglePlex  [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ve even been reports Google has plans for purchasing tons of dark fiber in preparation for GoogleNet. Whether this is part of Google&#8217;s grand scheme, no one outside the GooglePlex  [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwars door Amsterdam!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21345</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwars door Amsterdam!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nog even en offline is uit&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We kijken straks digitale tv via internet, chatten en telefoneren via Skype, het nieuwe Google Talk of een andere voice over ip-dienst en zullen steeds vaker lokale informatie gebruiken die is gebaseerd op diensten met als basis Google Maps, Google...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nog even en offline is uit</strong></p>

<p>We kijken straks digitale tv via internet, chatten en telefoneren via Skype, het nieuwe Google Talk of een andere voice over ip-dienst en zullen steeds vaker lokale informatie gebruiken die is gebaseerd op diensten met als basis Google Maps, Google&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21344</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21344</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think the implications here might be way bigger than we&#039;re thinking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking way into the future it&#039;s not inconceivable that we could all be connected to one another using Google Apps, on a Google Device, over a Google wireless network. That sounds a bit like Teilhard de Chardin&#039;s Noosphere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From news.bbc.co.uk: &quot;We are going to try to be the first in the world to connect everyone to everyone&quot;
Georges Harik, Google&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When Google buys a brain implant business it will get really interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the implications here might be way bigger than we&#8217;re thinking.</p>

<p>Looking way into the future it&#8217;s not inconceivable that we could all be connected to one another using Google Apps, on a Google Device, over a Google wireless network. That sounds a bit like Teilhard de Chardin&#8217;s Noosphere.</p>

<p>From news.bbc.co.uk: &#8220;We are going to try to be the first in the world to connect everyone to everyone&#8221;
Georges Harik, Google</p>

<p>When Google buys a brain implant business it will get really interesting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Vora</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21343</link>
		<dc:creator>A Vora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21343</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Could this be the first big step by Google towards a web-based OS?  This might be a long shot but here is my reasoning...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the major hurdles for web-based OSes is the QoS.  If a company can gaurantee a particular level of QoS I do not see why web-based OS is not feasible.  With Google being the ISP they can easily gaurantee this (assuming that in the next 4-5 years wireless technology can provide a reliable QoS model).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this be the first big step by Google towards a web-based OS?  This might be a long shot but here is my reasoning&#8230;</p>

<p>One of the major hurdles for web-based OSes is the QoS.  If a company can gaurantee a particular level of QoS I do not see why web-based OS is not feasible.  With Google being the ISP they can easily gaurantee this (assuming that in the next 4-5 years wireless technology can provide a reliable QoS model).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21342</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i agree :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21341</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure being involved with Cometa should add to a person&#039;s credibility . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure being involved with Cometa should add to a person&#8217;s credibility . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21340</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21340</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The owner of Bucks explained it perfectly in January 2003. Paraphrase -- It&#039;s not a communications service, it&#039;s a retail amenity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Direct Quote -- &quot;Charging for the online usage would be, for me, like charging for salt and pepper.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.rafer.net/blog/000012.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The owner of Bucks explained it perfectly in January 2003. Paraphrase &#8212; It&#8217;s not a communications service, it&#8217;s a retail amenity.</p>

<p>Direct Quote &#8212; &#8220;Charging for the online usage would be, for me, like charging for salt and pepper.&#8221;</p>

<p><a href="http://www.rafer.net/blog/000012.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rafer.net/blog/000012.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumit Chachra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21339</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumit Chachra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/22/google-wifi-take-two/#comment-21339</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well done Om. I think you deserve full credit for that story and this analysis of The Times story.... Its becoming obvious that Google is  going to be coming out with something big (and surprising) in the next year or so.... I would bet my money on the lines you are thinking though (not the space elevator!!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Om. I think you deserve full credit for that story and this analysis of The Times story&#8230;. Its becoming obvious that Google is  going to be coming out with something big (and surprising) in the next year or so&#8230;. I would bet my money on the lines you are thinking though (not the space elevator!!)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
