http://gigaom.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://gigaom.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106523 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 07:57:26 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106523 What kind of thing is going to happen at the Gizmo project?

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106522 Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:13:39 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106522 SIP needs to figure this firewall thing out. Kudos again to Skype.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106521 Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:52:03 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106521 Anecdotally, I can tell you that Both Skype and Gizmo happily penetrate my work firewall without any configuration (Something that X-Lite won’t do), but Gizmo still falls over when I plug in to my Uni network, whereas Skype seems to have no difficulties, even behind the quite restrictive (HTTP only?) Firewall in our labs.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106520 Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:13:17 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/16/something-changin-at-sipphone/#comment-106520 This firewall penetrating trick is a big mystery. First Skype claimed that they had licked the problem. Many others joined the chorus; but subsequent updates claimed improvements, as it is claimed here. It will be really nice to know some additional information and also some insight into how much of the problem is left to be conquered.

]]>