<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Cable Trials Broadband TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Florine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check http://www.nubatv.com instead. They are still in beta but they will get BIG soon. Amazing quality (forget the DVD quality).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check <a href="http://www.nubatv.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nubatv.com</a> instead. They are still in beta but they will get BIG soon. Amazing quality (forget the DVD quality).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brandon, don&#039;t assume an IPTV channel is analagous to a broadcast tv channel. I think it will be more like a VOD channel, that might only have a handful of shows per month. After actually reading the article, it is clear that it is not all TW content, though -- they talk about ESPN, for example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon, don&#8217;t assume an IPTV channel is analagous to a broadcast tv channel. I think it will be more like a VOD channel, that might only have a handful of shows per month. After actually reading the article, it is clear that it is not all TW content, though &#8212; they talk about ESPN, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 20:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesse: &quot;75 channels&quot; - so probably not only their content.

However, Doc - redistribution over IP could be considered over &quot;cable&quot; - which are the same rights they are entitled to now.  Thoughts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse: &#8220;75 channels&#8221; &#8211; so probably not only their content.</p>
<p>However, Doc &#8211; redistribution over IP could be considered over &#8220;cable&#8221; &#8211; which are the same rights they are entitled to now.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doc, since this is Time Warner, who are a content people, maybe they are only using their own content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, since this is Time Warner, who are a content people, maybe they are only using their own content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocDoc</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DocDoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Won&#039;t last.

Content people will come down hard on them for this stunt, as their contracts probably do not include any IP redistribution rights.

The limiting factor in these types of services are not the incumbents, but the content people.

Doc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t last.</p>
<p>Content people will come down hard on them for this stunt, as their contracts probably do not include any IP redistribution rights.</p>
<p>The limiting factor in these types of services are not the incumbents, but the content people.</p>
<p>Doc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/08/time-warner-cable-trials-broadband-tv/#comment-106241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m surprised a bigger deal is not being made of this...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m surprised a bigger deal is not being made of this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

