<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Morning Laugh: Cisco mulls buying Nokia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/08/07/sunday-morning-laugh-cisco-mulls-buying-nokia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/07/sunday-morning-laugh-cisco-mulls-buying-nokia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/07/sunday-morning-laugh-cisco-mulls-buying-nokia/#comment-106065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/07/sunday-morning-laugh-cisco-mulls-buying-nokia/#comment-106065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the most far-fetched idea since AOL buying Time Warner . . . Wait . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most far-fetched idea since AOL buying Time Warner . . . Wait . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songzilla_Blogger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/07/sunday-morning-laugh-cisco-mulls-buying-nokia/#comment-106064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Songzilla_Blogger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/07/sunday-morning-laugh-cisco-mulls-buying-nokia/#comment-106064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently heard a lot of outlandish rumors of who Cisco might buy next - none of them has made any business sense to me, and they all would involve an acquisition of huge capital proportions.  Like the others, it seems a real stretch to me that Cisco would spend ~$70B on an acquisition.

But why are these rumors floating around?  I can think of three possibilities:

(1)  Some really major acquisition is in the works, despite what my business sense tells me;

(2)  Cisco&#039;s investors would like to see Cisco make a big move and somehow get back to ceiling-less revenue growth, and a rocket flight stock;

(3)  Cisco, itself, enjoys such rumors, for they keep the company full view in the mind of the Fortune 500/100 business executives whose mindshare they need for continued sales success (growth).

Does this make me a cynic?

(Or am I a cynic solely for my skepticism about Cisco stock climbing back to $70 per share...)

- EP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently heard a lot of outlandish rumors of who Cisco might buy next &#8211; none of them has made any business sense to me, and they all would involve an acquisition of huge capital proportions.  Like the others, it seems a real stretch to me that Cisco would spend ~$70B on an acquisition.</p>
<p>But why are these rumors floating around?  I can think of three possibilities:</p>
<p>(1)  Some really major acquisition is in the works, despite what my business sense tells me;</p>
<p>(2)  Cisco&#8217;s investors would like to see Cisco make a big move and somehow get back to ceiling-less revenue growth, and a rocket flight stock;</p>
<p>(3)  Cisco, itself, enjoys such rumors, for they keep the company full view in the mind of the Fortune 500/100 business executives whose mindshare they need for continued sales success (growth).</p>
<p>Does this make me a cynic?</p>
<p>(Or am I a cynic solely for my skepticism about Cisco stock climbing back to $70 per share&#8230;)</p>
<p>- EP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

