<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile carrier consolidation in India</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/08/01/mobile-carrier-consolidation-in-india/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/01/mobile-carrier-consolidation-in-india/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:37:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NVSM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/01/mobile-carrier-consolidation-in-india/#comment-105763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NVSM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/01/mobile-carrier-consolidation-in-india/#comment-105763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi,
I thought you take figures seriously. You have mentioned that tata-birla combo bought cingular&#039;s stake in $400 million, while the FE story you linked (guess you based your comment on that story only!) says the deal amount was $300 million. Now, who is corrent? The original source or the interpretor?
Typo only? But we can&#039;t take chance with figures! One digit can change the entire story.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I thought you take figures seriously. You have mentioned that tata-birla combo bought cingular&#8217;s stake in $400 million, while the FE story you linked (guess you based your comment on that story only!) says the deal amount was $300 million. Now, who is corrent? The original source or the interpretor?<br />
Typo only? But we can&#8217;t take chance with figures! One digit can change the entire story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron banerjee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/08/01/mobile-carrier-consolidation-in-india/#comment-105762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ron banerjee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/08/01/mobile-carrier-consolidation-in-india/#comment-105762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carrier consolidation has a long way to go in India. Even if Idea, Spice, and Aircel disappears, and if BSNL and MTNL merge, this is just a start. This would leave five players in India: Hutch/Essar, Bharti, Reliance, Tata Teleservices, and BSNL/MTNL. Ultimately, this will be a four carrier market, and all four carriers will be integrated providers: ie fiber, Internet, Voice, ILD etc. Of all five majors, Hutch/Essar looks increasingly out of place as a pure-play mobile provider.

Mark my works: Bharti, as a fellow GSM provider with a strong foreign backer  Singapore Telecom, will eventually buy Hutch/Essar assets. BSNL/MTNL as state owned dinosaurs are too slow, and Reliance and Tata have staked their eggs in CDMA, not GSM.

A bold prediction, I know, but I think five is too many: four is just right for India.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrier consolidation has a long way to go in India. Even if Idea, Spice, and Aircel disappears, and if BSNL and MTNL merge, this is just a start. This would leave five players in India: Hutch/Essar, Bharti, Reliance, Tata Teleservices, and BSNL/MTNL. Ultimately, this will be a four carrier market, and all four carriers will be integrated providers: ie fiber, Internet, Voice, ILD etc. Of all five majors, Hutch/Essar looks increasingly out of place as a pure-play mobile provider.</p>
<p>Mark my works: Bharti, as a fellow GSM provider with a strong foreign backer  Singapore Telecom, will eventually buy Hutch/Essar assets. BSNL/MTNL as state owned dinosaurs are too slow, and Reliance and Tata have staked their eggs in CDMA, not GSM.</p>
<p>A bold prediction, I know, but I think five is too many: four is just right for India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

