<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content, the risk in war of the wires?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/#comment-19032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/#comment-19032</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It wasn&#039;t that long ago that Comcast was saying the reason its PPV OnDemand offerings were so lame was because WalMart had muscled in on the studios and insisted that they get a grace period to sell DVDs before the content is available elsewhere. Has something changed? I would be very surprised if you see an IPTV service, outside of a special trial here and there, launch with anything you don&#039;t get on Comcast or Time Warner. I expect them to come in with a some compelling price point, like the satellite guys, however.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t that long ago that Comcast was saying the reason its PPV OnDemand offerings were so lame was because WalMart had muscled in on the studios and insisted that they get a grace period to sell DVDs before the content is available elsewhere. Has something changed? I would be very surprised if you see an IPTV service, outside of a special trial here and there, launch with anything you don&#8217;t get on Comcast or Time Warner. I expect them to come in with a some compelling price point, like the satellite guys, however.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP Democracy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/#comment-19031</link>
		<dc:creator>IP Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/#comment-19031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Must-Read:  Economist Piece on IPTV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Courtesy of Om Malik, the July 28 edition of The Economist has a nice piece on the telephone industry&#8217;s efforts to launch IPTV services. As Om points out, there&#8217;s nothing new in the article, but it is a concise summary...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Must-Read:  Economist Piece on IPTV</strong></p>

<p>Courtesy of Om Malik, the July 28 edition of The Economist has a nice piece on the telephone industry&#8217;s efforts to launch IPTV services. As Om points out, there&#8217;s nothing new in the article, but it is a concise summary&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Geddes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/#comment-19030</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Geddes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/30/content-the-risk-in-war-of-the-wires/#comment-19030</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Saw the same article, and thought that the Economist is misleading its readers in suggesting there&#039;s any actual service in &#039;VoIP service&#039;.  If Skype can give it away, at an acceptable call quality, the cost is likely to be rolled up into a broadband sub, just like DNS and e-mail.  It&#039;s tablestakes, and not a differentiator or revenue source.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw the same article, and thought that the Economist is misleading its readers in suggesting there&#8217;s any actual service in &#8216;VoIP service&#8217;.  If Skype can give it away, at an acceptable call quality, the cost is likely to be rolled up into a broadband sub, just like DNS and e-mail.  It&#8217;s tablestakes, and not a differentiator or revenue source.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
