http://gigaom.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/ The Business of Technology Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:34:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 http://gigaom.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18804 David Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:38:32 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18804 Om likes to get his panties in a bunch and show how smart he is. Om likes to get his panties in a bunch and show how smart he is.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18803 aswath Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:38:52 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18803 Obviously a typo, otherwise Draper does not have to say "wouldn't even consider being acquired for less than $1 billion". But what about the largest provider? We know through Skype Journal that it is number of transactions. And Martin tells us that its revenue is from slippage, breakage or something dirty like that. If anything, there is less getting worked up when it comes to Skype. Obviously a typo, otherwise Draper does not have to say “wouldn’t even consider being acquired for less than $1 billion”. But what about the largest provider? We know through Skype Journal that it is number of transactions. And Martin tells us that its revenue is from slippage, breakage or something dirty like that. If anything, there is less getting worked up when it comes to Skype.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18802 Brad Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:26:14 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18802 I am sure they just mistakenly wrote billions when they meant millions. I am sure they just mistakenly wrote billions when they meant millions.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18801 pwb Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:48:19 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/21/skypes-imaginary-billions/#comment-18801 Just a typo. Doesn't seem like something to get too worked up about. Just a typo. Doesn’t seem like something to get too worked up about.

]]>