<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storage, the Rodney Dangerfield of technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 工作達人 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 關於儲存10件有趣的事</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-656909</link>
		<dc:creator>工作達人 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 關於儲存10件有趣的事</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-656909</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 科技歷史: 紐約時報 有一篇關於講究硬碟不錯的文章，這篇文章提醒了我，我們的數位生活是如何地仰賴這個低利潤的產業，如同之前所提的，從 iPod 到 TiVo 到我們的設定盒 - 每件事都跟儲存有關。 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 科技歷史: 紐約時報 有一篇關於講究硬碟不錯的文章，這篇文章提醒了我，我們的數位生活是如何地仰賴這個低利潤的產業，如同之前所提的，從 iPod 到 TiVo 到我們的設定盒 - 每件事都跟儲存有關。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Storage Forum: blog &#187; 10 Fun Facts About Storage</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18454</link>
		<dc:creator>The Storage Forum: blog &#187; 10 Fun Facts About Storage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] often ignored low-margin business. As mentioned before, from iPod to TiVo to our set-top boxes - everything is touched by storage.Times story reminded me of this quote from Storage maverick Al Shugart, who may have passed onto [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often ignored low-margin business. As mentioned before, from iPod to TiVo to our set-top boxes - everything is touched by storage.Times story reminded me of this quote from Storage maverick Al Shugart, who may have passed onto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grey eminence</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18453</link>
		<dc:creator>grey eminence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18453</guid>
		<description>Holographic Storage will even drive the cost down
further according to Colossal Storage.

Sandisk Flashcard Solid State Drives will Cost $ 90.00 a Gigabyte versus the Hard Drive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holographic Storage will even drive the cost down<br />
further according to Colossal Storage.</p>
<p>Sandisk Flashcard Solid State Drives will Cost $ 90.00 a Gigabyte versus the Hard Drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xlp-103</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18452</link>
		<dc:creator>xlp-103</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 04:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18452</guid>
		<description>They totally lack imagination in distinguishing themselves from the pack. I thought that some new built in flash caches were on the horizon that would speedup OS loading. There seems to be a lot of room for quieter and faster technologies. Everyone is very competitve about making the same exact thing. Never a broshure from these guys, no more television ads and few mag ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They totally lack imagination in distinguishing themselves from the pack. I thought that some new built in flash caches were on the horizon that would speedup OS loading. There seems to be a lot of room for quieter and faster technologies. Everyone is very competitve about making the same exact thing. Never a broshure from these guys, no more television ads and few mag ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willc2</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18451</link>
		<dc:creator>willc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18451</guid>
		<description>what good is a link to a pdf behind a paywall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what good is a link to a pdf behind a paywall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALT1040 &#187; ¿Por qué los discos duros son tan malos?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18450</link>
		<dc:creator>ALT1040 &#187; ¿Por qué los discos duros son tan malos?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18450</guid>
		<description>[...] io, 2005 - 05:44 &#124; Conversación de este post   ¿Por qué los discos duros son tan malos? Ohm Malik apunta a un dato interesante: Western Digital vendió 3 mil  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] io, 2005 - 05:44 | Conversación de este post   ¿Por qué los discos duros son tan malos? Ohm Malik apunta a un dato interesante: Western Digital vendió 3 mil  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BogeyMan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18449</link>
		<dc:creator>BogeyMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18449</guid>
		<description>IMHO storage will be a service or commodity like electricity, gas, or bandwith... storage manufacturers need to innovate beyond just "disk space" and "casing design"...

Guarantee a drive for life, offer standout software solutions for pain-free backups, or make it all virtual and let me have a secure (and backed up) copy of all of my stuff (all of it - including DVDs, CDs, Photos, Software, etc...) somewhere where I can access it from anywhere on the planet... now I would pay for that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO storage will be a service or commodity like electricity, gas, or bandwith&#8230; storage manufacturers need to innovate beyond just &#8220;disk space&#8221; and &#8220;casing design&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Guarantee a drive for life, offer standout software solutions for pain-free backups, or make it all virtual and let me have a secure (and backed up) copy of all of my stuff (all of it - including DVDs, CDs, Photos, Software, etc&#8230;) somewhere where I can access it from anywhere on the planet&#8230; now I would pay for that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gizmodo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18448</link>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/11/storage-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-technology/#comment-18448</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hard Drives: A Near-Losing Venture&lt;/strong&gt;

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I have no sympathy for hard drive manufacturers' low profits. Sure, the price war has made storage more affordable than ever, but Om is talking about Western Digital's profits of only $151 million on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hard Drives: A Near-Losing Venture</strong></p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m in the minority, but I have no sympathy for hard drive manufacturers&#8217; low profits. Sure, the price war has made storage more affordable than ever, but Om is talking about Western Digital&#8217;s profits of only $151 million on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
