<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype, Not Vonage Synonymous with VoIP in Blogsphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18173</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Zimmerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18173</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think Vonage has gone over the edge with respect to the effort put into their advertising vs. the effort placed in their services.  I&#039;ve been a Vonage customer for about a half year and have been satisified with the service.  I also happen to be a hater of junk e-mail.  I figure that any company that markets its services by randomly sending their junk over the internet is wasting a lot of people&#039;s time and is a company of very low morals...  The people that resort to sending junk e-mail belong in jail.
About a month ago, I started to receive junk e-mail from a company that calls itself Vonage in their return e-mail address, but ID&#039;s itself as &quot;Rewards Overdrive&quot; at the bottom of their e-mail.  It is trying to sell me Vonage service which I already have.  I tried to unsubscribe but continue to receive these junk e-mails. (and seemingly more) I attempted to get Vonage to contact Rewards Overdrive to have my e-mail address removed, but I quickly found that Vonage is not equipped to handle any service calls that don&#039;t fall into one of the standard catagories that you can select after making several automated selections on their automated support system.  The Bottom Line is: 1) Don&#039;t buy Vonage services thru &quot;Rewards Overdrive&quot; - They are a sleezy outfit. 2) Be cautious selecting Vonage services.  They&#039;ve obviously dropped into a lower catagory of company that resorts to low marketing tactics and is not equipped to handle questions / problems that don&#039;t fall into common, precise catagories.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Vonage has gone over the edge with respect to the effort put into their advertising vs. the effort placed in their services.  I&#8217;ve been a Vonage customer for about a half year and have been satisified with the service.  I also happen to be a hater of junk e-mail.  I figure that any company that markets its services by randomly sending their junk over the internet is wasting a lot of people&#8217;s time and is a company of very low morals&#8230;  The people that resort to sending junk e-mail belong in jail.
About a month ago, I started to receive junk e-mail from a company that calls itself Vonage in their return e-mail address, but ID&#8217;s itself as &#8220;Rewards Overdrive&#8221; at the bottom of their e-mail.  It is trying to sell me Vonage service which I already have.  I tried to unsubscribe but continue to receive these junk e-mails. (and seemingly more) I attempted to get Vonage to contact Rewards Overdrive to have my e-mail address removed, but I quickly found that Vonage is not equipped to handle any service calls that don&#8217;t fall into one of the standard catagories that you can select after making several automated selections on their automated support system.  The Bottom Line is: 1) Don&#8217;t buy Vonage services thru &#8220;Rewards Overdrive&#8221; &#8211; They are a sleezy outfit. 2) Be cautious selecting Vonage services.  They&#8217;ve obviously dropped into a lower catagory of company that resorts to low marketing tactics and is not equipped to handle questions / problems that don&#8217;t fall into common, precise catagories.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype Journal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18171</link>
		<dc:creator>Skype Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18171</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vonage Spending Not Working Apparently&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A pointer in Om&#039;s blog took me to karnellKNOWLEDGE. It&#039;s a great rant on how Vonage strategy for customer aquisition just doesn&#039;t stack up. Maybe Vonage should offer a free softphone? It looks at Skype mentions in the blogosphere and contrasts the i...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vonage Spending Not Working Apparently</strong></p>

<p>A pointer in Om&#8217;s blog took me to karnellKNOWLEDGE. It&#8217;s a great rant on how Vonage strategy for customer aquisition just doesn&#8217;t stack up. Maybe Vonage should offer a free softphone? It looks at Skype mentions in the blogosphere and contrasts the i&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18169</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18169</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What telephone number do you give out? Your cell phone number or your SkypeIn number? Is your SkypeIn number a new number - or could you port your landline number to it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t misjudge this: I think Skype is a fine application that works in a way that complements other activities of bloggers. And, for that reason, I think it gets hyped among bloggers more than Vonage (similar, in fact, to Apple). However, I think Vonage and Skype are different animals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think Vonage has done a very job at being synonymous with broadband telephony.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What telephone number do you give out? Your cell phone number or your SkypeIn number? Is your SkypeIn number a new number &#8211; or could you port your landline number to it?</p>

<p>Don&#8217;t misjudge this: I think Skype is a fine application that works in a way that complements other activities of bloggers. And, for that reason, I think it gets hyped among bloggers more than Vonage (similar, in fact, to Apple). However, I think Vonage and Skype are different animals.</p>

<p>I think Vonage has done a very job at being synonymous with broadband telephony.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18167</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18167</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I personally use both Skype and Vonage for different and distinct purposes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I wanted a VoIP service that looked, smelled, and quacked like POTS, I chose Vonage. My family can use it, it works in every room in the house, and 911 &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I&#039;m travelling - especially internationally - I use Skype. It&#039;s just me in one room with a high speed connection and a computer, so a USB headset makes sense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Skype appeals to people who live next to or near their computer, understand the technology, and can live with one phone. Bloggers are these people.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vonage is attempting to appeal to part of America, who can generally set up the VCR, has several phones in the house, turns off the computer when it&#039;s not in use, and doesn&#039;t have the time to fiddle with technology. Those people are not bloggers - at least not usually very good ones.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally use both Skype and Vonage for different and distinct purposes.</p>

<p>When I wanted a VoIP service that looked, smelled, and quacked like POTS, I chose Vonage. My family can use it, it works in every room in the house, and 911 <em>should</em> work.</p>

<p>When I&#8217;m travelling &#8211; especially internationally &#8211; I use Skype. It&#8217;s just me in one room with a high speed connection and a computer, so a USB headset makes sense.</p>

<p>Skype appeals to people who live next to or near their computer, understand the technology, and can live with one phone. Bloggers are these people.</p>

<p>Vonage is attempting to appeal to part of America, who can generally set up the VCR, has several phones in the house, turns off the computer when it&#8217;s not in use, and doesn&#8217;t have the time to fiddle with technology. Those people are not bloggers &#8211; at least not usually very good ones.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Holtz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18165</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Holtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18165</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Vonage may not need a PC, but it needs a high-speed connection, which is usually pretty close to the PC. I have a Skype phone plugged into my USB hub. It works like a phone. It looks like a phone. It rings like a phone. I get voice mail. I can dial a landline phone (with my SkypeOut account) and people with a POTS phone can call me on a landline number (with my SkypeIn account). Pretty darned close to a telephone replacement for me. In fact, I&#039;m dumping my landline account and going 100% Skype and cell phone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vonage may not need a PC, but it needs a high-speed connection, which is usually pretty close to the PC. I have a Skype phone plugged into my USB hub. It works like a phone. It looks like a phone. It rings like a phone. I get voice mail. I can dial a landline phone (with my SkypeOut account) and people with a POTS phone can call me on a landline number (with my SkypeIn account). Pretty darned close to a telephone replacement for me. In fact, I&#8217;m dumping my landline account and going 100% Skype and cell phone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18163</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18163</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Skype and Vonage are two different animals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Skype is a PC communicator: Voice, Text, File Transfers. It makes sense for the blabosphere to be enamored with it: pajama wearing, PC typing people &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; communicate this way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Vonage is a telephone replacement. It is marketed (heavily, I&#039;d agree) as a means to reduce the monthly nut you dish out to your phone company. It works a lot like an enhanced telephone service and is available and used without a PC.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype and Vonage are two different animals.</p>

<p>Skype is a PC communicator: Voice, Text, File Transfers. It makes sense for the blabosphere to be enamored with it: pajama wearing, PC typing people <em>would</em> communicate this way.</p>

<p>Vonage is a telephone replacement. It is marketed (heavily, I&#8217;d agree) as a means to reduce the monthly nut you dish out to your phone company. It works a lot like an enhanced telephone service and is available and used without a PC.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18161</link>
		<dc:creator>saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 19:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/04/skype-not-vonage-synonymous-with-voip-in-blogsphere/#comment-18161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;couldn&#039;t agree more with the blogpulse analysis of buzziness - see http://localglobe.blogspot.com/2005/06/skype-tracks-voip-in-blog-buzz.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couldn&#8217;t agree more with the blogpulse analysis of buzziness &#8211; see <a href="http://localglobe.blogspot.com/2005/06/skype-tracks-voip-in-blog-buzz.html" rel="nofollow">http://localglobe.blogspot.com/2005/06/skype-tracks-voip-in-blog-buzz.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
