<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Spam Good for Operators?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/mobile-spam-good-for-operators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/mobile-spam-good-for-operators/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lockergnome's Mobile Lifestyle</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/mobile-spam-good-for-operators/#comment-18065</link>
		<dc:creator>Lockergnome's Mobile Lifestyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2005 06:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/01/mobile-spam-good-for-operators/#comment-18065</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mobile Spam Good for Operators?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OK, I suppose this logic works if that particular carrier is charging for each message received. But since mine does not, I have not really had to much to gripe about....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mobile Spam Good for Operators?</strong></p>

<p>OK, I suppose this logic works if that particular carrier is charging for each message received. But since mine does not, I have not really had to much to gripe about&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
