<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOCSIS 3.0, PacketCable 2.0 and the CableCards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Dude</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/#comment-18027</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/#comment-18027</guid>
		<description>Oh and re: 100Mbps - bring it on!  Once the speed is there, new apps will be imaginged in short order.  I recall someone once asked why I needed 1Mbps at home too and that seems kind of silly in retrospect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and re: 100Mbps - bring it on!  Once the speed is there, new apps will be imaginged in short order.  I recall someone once asked why I needed 1Mbps at home too and that seems kind of silly in retrospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Dude</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/#comment-18025</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/#comment-18025</guid>
		<description>Why are hardware-based cable cards good and downloadable soft-client cards bad?  Seems to be that software-based is the way the world has moved.  Easier / quicker to download new features over the network rather than swapping out hardware.  What am I missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are hardware-based cable cards good and downloadable soft-client cards bad?  Seems to be that software-based is the way the world has moved.  Easier / quicker to download new features over the network rather than swapping out hardware.  What am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/#comment-18023</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/07/01/docsis-30-packetcable-20-and-the-cablecards/#comment-18023</guid>
		<description>Besides QoS, what VoIP features are needed in the link layer? What specific support does PacketCable have for SIP and why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides QoS, what VoIP features are needed in the link layer? What specific support does PacketCable have for SIP and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
