<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft eyeing Teleo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toktumi&#8217;s New iPhone App Makes VoIP Calls Over 3G &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toktumi&#8217;s New iPhone App Makes VoIP Calls Over 3G &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Toktumi, which launched at DEMO 2008, has had to traverse a difficult path to get to where it is today, and Sisson is understandably excited about the kind of exposure the approval from Apple of its app will bring. Sisson, a veteran of the VoIP business, sold his last company, Teleo, to Microsoft. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Toktumi, which launched at DEMO 2008, has had to traverse a difficult path to get to where it is today, and Sisson is understandably excited about the kind of exposure the approval from Apple of its app will bring. Sisson, a veteran of the VoIP business, sold his last company, Teleo, to Microsoft. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epilogue</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[epilogue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft eats Teleo&lt;/strong&gt;

Microsoft buys VoIP company Teleo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft eats Teleo</strong></p>
<p>Microsoft buys VoIP company Teleo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Microsoft says it bought Teleo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Microsoft says it bought Teleo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ught Teleo	 		 		Today might be a good day to yell &#8220;touchdown.&#8221; Two months ago, I had reported that Microsoft had been eyeing Teleo, a small San Francisco-based VoIP provi [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ught Teleo	 		 		Today might be a good day to yell &#8220;touchdown.&#8221; Two months ago, I had reported that Microsoft had been eyeing Teleo, a small San Francisco-based VoIP provi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Microsoft says it bought Teleo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Microsoft says it bought Teleo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 		Today might be a good day to yell &#8220;touchdown.&#8221; Nearly a month and a half ago, I had reported that Microsoft had bought Teleo, a small San Francisco-based VoIP provider.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 		Today might be a good day to yell &#8220;touchdown.&#8221; Nearly a month and a half ago, I had reported that Microsoft had bought Teleo, a small San Francisco-based VoIP provider.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Teleo, the portable VoIP that no longer clicks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Teleo, the portable VoIP that no longer clicks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] licks	 		 		Apparently, Teleo-software is no longer available for downloads. Did Microsoft swallow them so quickly? Repeated requests for clarification on Microsoft-buying-them have e [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] licks	 		 		Apparently, Teleo-software is no longer available for downloads. Did Microsoft swallow them so quickly? Repeated requests for clarification on Microsoft-buying-them have e [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Earthlink&#8217;s free VoIP with Vling Beta</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Earthlink&#8217;s free VoIP with Vling Beta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Skype competitor is creating a lot of buzz. Yahoo is making (VoIP) noise with Dialpad, and soon Microsoft will have something in the market as well. Perhaps that is why it is opportun [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Skype competitor is creating a lot of buzz. Yahoo is making (VoIP) noise with Dialpad, and soon Microsoft will have something in the market as well. Perhaps that is why it is opportun [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yelling Lizard &#187; Portable Phone Service For $4.95 A month?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yelling Lizard &#187; Portable Phone Service For $4.95 A month?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ntly they have a split-client design that is patent-pending. 	Also, according to scoopster Om Malik, a deal is in the works between Microsoft and Teleo.  Apparently Microsoft wants a  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ntly they have a split-client design that is patent-pending. 	Also, according to scoopster Om Malik, a deal is in the works between Microsoft and Teleo.  Apparently Microsoft wants a  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Daley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Daley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skype&#039;s call quality + ability to work through firewalls and on LANs with NAT have made it especially attractive to many.

However, earlier this week Michael Robertson of Lindows/Linspire fame launched a VoIP client (http://www.gizmoproject.com/) he claims offers all those ease-of-use benefits of Skype, but is fully SIP compliant.

That is another one to watch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype&#8217;s call quality + ability to work through firewalls and on LANs with NAT have made it especially attractive to many.</p>
<p>However, earlier this week Michael Robertson of Lindows/Linspire fame launched a VoIP client (<a href="http://www.gizmoproject.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gizmoproject.com/</a>) he claims offers all those ease-of-use benefits of Skype, but is fully SIP compliant.</p>
<p>That is another one to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curious</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interesting. nikotel has stuff like that since 4 years with SIP and flawless NAT traversal. nothing special I guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting. nikotel has stuff like that since 4 years with SIP and flawless NAT traversal. nothing special I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: accessline</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[accessline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what about accessline?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about accessline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 03:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jake... good arguments and i think you bring up some good points. i am mulling over them/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake&#8230; good arguments and i think you bring up some good points. i am mulling over them/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting question.

Even though Google is all about the Internet, the Web, and the Browser, you can extend that to say they&#039;re also about the PC.

You would think that they would be looking at a PC Client and a service that has a strong PC Client. Being strong on the off net/PSTN side probably is not as important to them. In fact, establishing direct, paying/billing end user relationships for phone call level micropayments probably does not thrill Google (at least until they get their PayPal clone in place).

Of course, Skype would come to mind. Strong PC Client with a Google-sized audience built in.

Vonage (with basic XTen client interface) treats the PC as a second class citizen - they are more focused on being a telephone replacement vs a communication innovation - probably does not fit.

AT&amp;T CallVantage is a more innovative telephone replacement than Vonage, but still does not pay much attention to the PC. Probably a hard nut to shake out of the AT&amp;T/SBC tie up, even though it will probably continue to whither there.

DeltaThree as a behind the scenes enabler of telephone replacements at Verizon and SBC doesn&#039;t seem to fit either.

The power of Skype in this scenario is that it brings both an IM (non-PSTN) communication component, an internet (PC-PC) communication component, and the PSTN bridging function all at once.

I think when looking at the potentials, the things to consider are: how much emphasis is on internet communication (IM, PC-PC) vs PSTN off net calling and how strong/unique is the PC client. I think that&#039;s what a Google would look for.

Plus, doesn&#039;t Skype have the ability to show html/advertising. This is important, too, since Google would derive revenue by showing them ads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question.</p>
<p>Even though Google is all about the Internet, the Web, and the Browser, you can extend that to say they&#8217;re also about the PC.</p>
<p>You would think that they would be looking at a PC Client and a service that has a strong PC Client. Being strong on the off net/PSTN side probably is not as important to them. In fact, establishing direct, paying/billing end user relationships for phone call level micropayments probably does not thrill Google (at least until they get their PayPal clone in place).</p>
<p>Of course, Skype would come to mind. Strong PC Client with a Google-sized audience built in.</p>
<p>Vonage (with basic XTen client interface) treats the PC as a second class citizen &#8211; they are more focused on being a telephone replacement vs a communication innovation &#8211; probably does not fit.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T CallVantage is a more innovative telephone replacement than Vonage, but still does not pay much attention to the PC. Probably a hard nut to shake out of the AT&amp;T/SBC tie up, even though it will probably continue to whither there.</p>
<p>DeltaThree as a behind the scenes enabler of telephone replacements at Verizon and SBC doesn&#8217;t seem to fit either.</p>
<p>The power of Skype in this scenario is that it brings both an IM (non-PSTN) communication component, an internet (PC-PC) communication component, and the PSTN bridging function all at once.</p>
<p>I think when looking at the potentials, the things to consider are: how much emphasis is on internet communication (IM, PC-PC) vs PSTN off net calling and how strong/unique is the PC client. I think that&#8217;s what a Google would look for.</p>
<p>Plus, doesn&#8217;t Skype have the ability to show html/advertising. This is important, too, since Google would derive revenue by showing them ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[guys thanks for making all those great points. just wondering if you had thoughts on who are the likely players who could get snapped up - i.e. most importantly who will google by to get into the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys thanks for making all those great points. just wondering if you had thoughts on who are the likely players who could get snapped up &#8211; i.e. most importantly who will google by to get into the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If MS does use it for its own client needs, here are the reasons Teleo is attractive to MS:

1. Extensive integration into MS Office applications
2. SIP based
3. Traverses firewalls without special setup
4. PSTN connectivity
5. Works in Corporate environments

I could see MS buying Teleo based on any of #1, 3, or 4 alone.  Teleo is known for its MS integration; firewall traversal is a big hurdle for SIP; and MS could just be looking for PSTN functionality.

I&#039;ll be interested to see how Yahoo succeeds in the firewall traversal.  One reason why Skype is the best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If MS does use it for its own client needs, here are the reasons Teleo is attractive to MS:</p>
<p>1. Extensive integration into MS Office applications<br />
2. SIP based<br />
3. Traverses firewalls without special setup<br />
4. PSTN connectivity<br />
5. Works in Corporate environments</p>
<p>I could see MS buying Teleo based on any of #1, 3, or 4 alone.  Teleo is known for its MS integration; firewall traversal is a big hurdle for SIP; and MS could just be looking for PSTN functionality.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see how Yahoo succeeds in the firewall traversal.  One reason why Skype is the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I thought Teleo would be very attractive to Google.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I thought Teleo would be very attractive to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/28/microsoft-eyeing-teleo/#comment-104758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In fact, I always saw this as Teleo&#039;s business strategy - not so much the direct consumer, but rather a wholesaler of their product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, I always saw this as Teleo&#8217;s business strategy &#8211; not so much the direct consumer, but rather a wholesaler of their product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

