<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerPC, chip of choice for super super computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/#comment-104570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/#comment-104570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, It&#039;s Obvious Intel is a large factor in the Super Computer world,
AMD who released the Athlon XP, which run very hot, push design limits to their end, and anyone who is in Electronics knows a device will deviate slightly from it&#039;s original electrical characteristics when it is pushed, and in symmetrical multi-processing, deviations mean more obvious malfunctions.
Intel has had a history of properly rating processors,
and designing them to run at proper temperatures.
And now that the Intel Itanium Architechture is getting a faster FSB, performance and throughput will improve.

It is not at all surprising to me that intel is ahead of AMD here.

And IBM has also been in this game a while,
and is not only familiar with processor architechture but also very familiar with system architechture, (chipsets, devices and motherboards).

The power processors have been refined by &#039;people in the know&#039;. And even completely revamped for the &#039;64bit&#039; realm.

It is unfortunate there is not enough desktop base software for the power/G5 processors.

It will be interesting to see what Jobs has in mind for the Intel chip in the Apple world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, It&#8217;s Obvious Intel is a large factor in the Super Computer world,<br />
AMD who released the Athlon XP, which run very hot, push design limits to their end, and anyone who is in Electronics knows a device will deviate slightly from it&#8217;s original electrical characteristics when it is pushed, and in symmetrical multi-processing, deviations mean more obvious malfunctions.<br />
Intel has had a history of properly rating processors,<br />
and designing them to run at proper temperatures.<br />
And now that the Intel Itanium Architechture is getting a faster FSB, performance and throughput will improve.</p>
<p>It is not at all surprising to me that intel is ahead of AMD here.</p>
<p>And IBM has also been in this game a while,<br />
and is not only familiar with processor architechture but also very familiar with system architechture, (chipsets, devices and motherboards).</p>
<p>The power processors have been refined by &#8216;people in the know&#8217;. And even completely revamped for the &#8217;64bit&#8217; realm.</p>
<p>It is unfortunate there is not enough desktop base software for the power/G5 processors.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what Jobs has in mind for the Intel chip in the Apple world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/#comment-104569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/#comment-104569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once a chip reporter, always a chip reporter. i agree. should have focused on gige but left it for next week :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a chip reporter, always a chip reporter. i agree. should have focused on gige but left it for next week :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/#comment-104568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/powerpc-chip-of-choice-for-super-super-computers/#comment-104568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t this supposed to be the &quot;broadband blog,&quot;  what&#039;s with all the focus on processors?  Isn&#039;t it about the interconnects, man.  It looks like GigE has gained some ground in terms of deployments, at the notable expense of Myrinet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this supposed to be the &#8220;broadband blog,&#8221;  what&#8217;s with all the focus on processors?  Isn&#8217;t it about the interconnects, man.  It looks like GigE has gained some ground in terms of deployments, at the notable expense of Myrinet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

