<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Gen Wireless is Here&#8230; Almost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Qualcomm to acquire Flarion for $600 Million</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Qualcomm to acquire Flarion for $600 Million]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] someone said, if you can&#8217;t beat them, buy them. More to follow.  Previously&#8230;   Nextgen Wireless is Here, Almost Flarion adds a little spice in India Flarion&amp;#821 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] someone said, if you can&#8217;t beat them, buy them. More to follow.  Previously&#8230;   Nextgen Wireless is Here, Almost Flarion adds a little spice in India Flarion&amp;#821 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting, LG. I know of a Navini network in the US that is supporting vehicular users, but it is in a very flat place with base-stations very far apart so there may not be much handing off. I&#039;m going to have to look into this further. Of course, Navini has promised to support WiMax, which will require a change in their protocols and may eliminate any such issues -- but when that will happen seems up in the air.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, LG. I know of a Navini network in the US that is supporting vehicular users, but it is in a very flat place with base-stations very far apart so there may not be much handing off. I&#8217;m going to have to look into this further. Of course, Navini has promised to support WiMax, which will require a change in their protocols and may eliminate any such issues &#8212; but when that will happen seems up in the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesse,
Sorry, they are actuallly selling 1mbit/384kbit Unwired connections as well, I just included those as examples at various price points.
The Unwired network here has been plagued by dropouts as well, that don&#039;t seem to be coverage related (My girlfriend who lives on the 8th floor of an apartment block with strong signal suffers from them pretty regularly).
When I asked the Unwired guys about Unwired at vehicle speeds, they said that the difficulty was with &quot;smooth handoff&quot; between base stations, apparently connection set up/tear down takes around 30-40 seconds whenever you switch base stations (and at vehicle speeds, you&#039;re switching base stations every 2-3 minutes, hence no Unwired connection :) )
Unwired here suffers from (comparatively) high latency also (around 120-140ms to the 2nd hop), which has made it unsuitable for VOIP so far. A VOIP trial was abandoned by Unwired in May of this year. I&#039;ve got an idea that this is purely a network buildout thing, they&#039;ve used Wireless backhaul for some of their basestations (and dark fibre for others). The base stations with wireless backhaul (which tend to be in the suburbs, where cheap fibre wasn&#039;t available) are the ones that exhibit particularly high pings.
Iburst, by comparison, is pretty good. First-hop pings still hover at the 60-70ms level, which is substantially higher than DSL and light-years from Cable here, but it&#039;s usable for VOIP.
LG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse,<br />
Sorry, they are actuallly selling 1mbit/384kbit Unwired connections as well, I just included those as examples at various price points.<br />
The Unwired network here has been plagued by dropouts as well, that don&#8217;t seem to be coverage related (My girlfriend who lives on the 8th floor of an apartment block with strong signal suffers from them pretty regularly).<br />
When I asked the Unwired guys about Unwired at vehicle speeds, they said that the difficulty was with &#8220;smooth handoff&#8221; between base stations, apparently connection set up/tear down takes around 30-40 seconds whenever you switch base stations (and at vehicle speeds, you&#8217;re switching base stations every 2-3 minutes, hence no Unwired connection :) )<br />
Unwired here suffers from (comparatively) high latency also (around 120-140ms to the 2nd hop), which has made it unsuitable for VOIP so far. A VOIP trial was abandoned by Unwired in May of this year. I&#8217;ve got an idea that this is purely a network buildout thing, they&#8217;ve used Wireless backhaul for some of their basestations (and dark fibre for others). The base stations with wireless backhaul (which tend to be in the suburbs, where cheap fibre wasn&#8217;t available) are the ones that exhibit particularly high pings.<br />
Iburst, by comparison, is pretty good. First-hop pings still hover at the 60-70ms level, which is substantially higher than DSL and light-years from Cable here, but it&#8217;s usable for VOIP.<br />
LG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised to hear the iBurst system is working better, as Unwired is using Navini equipment which is seems far more popular in the US than the Arraycom/Kyocera&#039;s iBurst equipment. Navini should be good for up to 60 mph so the &quot;jogging speed&quot; might be a function of a less than optimal network build out. In the US, Our trains rarely get above 60 mph so I had never even considered the issue. Clearly this is something that Navini will have to work on considering even mesh WiFi systems have tested sucessfuly at speeds &gt; 100 mph. Hopefully this is a software isssue and not a function of poor design in their smart antenna system. Poor build out might also explain their low data rates -- a well designed Navini implementation should easily support 1M/256k.

It is interesting to note that both systems rely heavily on smart antennae, in light of the Intel/Arraycom WiMax partnership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised to hear the iBurst system is working better, as Unwired is using Navini equipment which is seems far more popular in the US than the Arraycom/Kyocera&#8217;s iBurst equipment. Navini should be good for up to 60 mph so the &#8220;jogging speed&#8221; might be a function of a less than optimal network build out. In the US, Our trains rarely get above 60 mph so I had never even considered the issue. Clearly this is something that Navini will have to work on considering even mesh WiFi systems have tested sucessfuly at speeds &gt; 100 mph. Hopefully this is a software isssue and not a function of poor design in their smart antenna system. Poor build out might also explain their low data rates &#8212; a well designed Navini implementation should easily support 1M/256k.</p>
<p>It is interesting to note that both systems rely heavily on smart antennae, in light of the Intel/Arraycom WiMax partnership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niraj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niraj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this mean 3G wireless is dead?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean 3G wireless is dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in Sydney we&#039;re lucky enough to have two decent wireless providers, Unwired and Iburst. Iburst is the technically better service (Unwired doesn&#039;t work at anything above jogging speeds, whereas Iburst works great even on trains), but they&#039;re both available, with Sydney wide coverage, at prices pretty comparable to DSL.
In fact, Unwired even have &quot;dial-up&quot; style 64k/32k plans for $15/month, and real broadband (well 256k/64k with a 2gb download limit) for around $30//month
Iburst plans range from around $25/month for a low usage 256k plan, to $130/month for an unlimited 1mbit/512kbit service.

Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isp.net.au&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.isp.net.au&lt;/a&gt; for Iburst, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwired.com.au&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.unwired.com.au&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a&gt; for Unwired.
There&#039;s a complete list of all Unwired and Iburst plans, from all the various resellers at &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/bc-plan.cfm?state=nsw&amp;class=0&amp;type=res&amp;pre=200&amp;cost=0&amp;speed=0&amp;upspeed=0&amp;ip=1&amp;conntype=6&amp;rt=1&amp;sort=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whirlpool&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Sydney we&#8217;re lucky enough to have two decent wireless providers, Unwired and Iburst. Iburst is the technically better service (Unwired doesn&#8217;t work at anything above jogging speeds, whereas Iburst works great even on trains), but they&#8217;re both available, with Sydney wide coverage, at prices pretty comparable to DSL.<br />
In fact, Unwired even have &#8220;dial-up&#8221; style 64k/32k plans for $15/month, and real broadband (well 256k/64k with a 2gb download limit) for around $30//month<br />
Iburst plans range from around $25/month for a low usage 256k plan, to $130/month for an unlimited 1mbit/512kbit service.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.isp.net.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.isp.net.au</a> for Iburst, <a href="http://www.unwired.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.unwired.com.au</a> and <a> for Unwired.<br />
There&#8217;s a complete list of all Unwired and Iburst plans, from all the various resellers at </a><a href="http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/bc-plan.cfm?state=nsw&amp;class=0&amp;type=res&amp;pre=200&amp;cost=0&amp;speed=0&amp;upspeed=0&amp;ip=1&amp;conntype=6&amp;rt=1&amp;sort=2" rel="nofollow">Whirlpool</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[priety very pretty... but will always be an aishwarya rai fan. anyway, i&#039;ve said it here before, cheap PCs and Bollywood over IP (BoIP) would have the telecom industry explode in India.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>priety very pretty&#8230; but will always be an aishwarya rai fan. anyway, i&#8217;ve said it here before, cheap PCs and Bollywood over IP (BoIP) would have the telecom industry explode in India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dude two words  - preity zinta. forget making sense!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude two words  &#8211; preity zinta. forget making sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/23/next-gen-wireless-is-here-almost/#comment-104583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think we&#039;ll all be at the age when we need diapers (never mind brandy, cigars and broadband) before a Bollywood movie is made that makes sense... which suits me fine... the more non-sensical the better, i say!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think we&#8217;ll all be at the age when we need diapers (never mind brandy, cigars and broadband) before a Bollywood movie is made that makes sense&#8230; which suits me fine&#8230; the more non-sensical the better, i say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

