<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype #1 in North American VOIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:31:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry borsato</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/#comment-104387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larry borsato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/#comment-104387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Skype on cell phones? Not so fast.&lt;/strong&gt;

Steve McGeown, director of product management for Sandvine, has done some research that suggests that Skype is number one in VoIP in North America:Calls using Skype Technologies SA account for nearly half of the VOIP minutes used (46.2 percent) and...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Skype on cell phones? Not so fast.</strong></p>
<p>Steve McGeown, director of product management for Sandvine, has done some research that suggests that Skype is number one in VoIP in North America:Calls using Skype Technologies SA account for nearly half of the VOIP minutes used (46.2 percent) and&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath Rao</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/#comment-104386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aswath Rao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/#comment-104386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James ( http://eurotelcoblog.blogspot.com/2005/06/lies-damned-lies-and-voip-statistics.html ) questions this analysis by suggesting that other statistics counter this claim. As usual, the problem could be potential double counting. For example, it is not clear whether they made sure &quot;relay traffic&quot; is isolated from the count.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James ( <a href="http://eurotelcoblog.blogspot.com/2005/06/lies-damned-lies-and-voip-statistics.html" rel="nofollow">http://eurotelcoblog.blogspot.com/2005/06/lies-damned-lies-and-voip-statistics.html</a> ) questions this analysis by suggesting that other statistics counter this claim. As usual, the problem could be potential double counting. For example, it is not clear whether they made sure &#8220;relay traffic&#8221; is isolated from the count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t5amj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/#comment-104385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[t5amj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/17/skype-1-in-north-american-voip/#comment-104385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How scientific is this study? How did they count all those skype minutes and the other VoIP provider minutes to come up with that percentage?

It is hard to believe they have a reliable way to get that information...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How scientific is this study? How did they count all those skype minutes and the other VoIP provider minutes to come up with that percentage?</p>
<p>It is hard to believe they have a reliable way to get that information&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

