<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BT Fusion Big Time (BT) Flop?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is BT Fusion Dead in the Water? - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is BT Fusion Dead in the Water? - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] are Fusion-compatible. It was first marketed to home users and later to businesses. Om had his doubts about Fusion when BT unveiled it in June 2005, then called [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are Fusion-compatible. It was first marketed to home users and later to businesses. Om had his doubts about Fusion when BT unveiled it in June 2005, then called [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Torrens</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Torrens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is anyone offerng nice Wi Fi Phones, now that woyld be more interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone offerng nice Wi Fi Phones, now that woyld be more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Torrens</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Torrens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a BT Customer and I have just been offered 3 monthes free BT Broadband, a free new Fusion ADSL wireless modem, new mobile for 9.45 per month and I have looked at it and conluded I am better off staying with my existing BT Yahoo Modem, looking for the latest best offers for Mble conracts and using Skype and MSN to communicate/talk free on the internet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a BT Customer and I have just been offered 3 monthes free BT Broadband, a free new Fusion ADSL wireless modem, new mobile for 9.45 per month and I have looked at it and conluded I am better off staying with my existing BT Yahoo Modem, looking for the latest best offers for Mble conracts and using Skype and MSN to communicate/talk free on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will be very surprised if this ever really takes off. Skype still offer better value, and calling BT Fusion still costs too much. It is reminisent of 3G, looks much better on paper. A WiFi version may show  more potential, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be very surprised if this ever really takes off. Skype still offer better value, and calling BT Fusion still costs too much. It is reminisent of 3G, looks much better on paper. A WiFi version may show  more potential, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh it is for real, but not a large scale. i am sure they cherry picked their people on this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it is for real, but not a large scale. i am sure they cherry picked their people on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be curious to know who are these 400 mysterious triallists. I registered my interest on BT&#039;s website but I haven&#039;t heard back from them... is thid for real?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know who are these 400 mysterious triallists. I registered my interest on BT&#8217;s website but I haven&#8217;t heard back from them&#8230; is thid for real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think what BT is testing right now isn&#039;t even WiFi, but Bluetooth. The WiFi product is the next generation and should be much better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what BT is testing right now isn&#8217;t even WiFi, but Bluetooth. The WiFi product is the next generation and should be much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeeves</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeeves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have to agree with jrx35. This is certainly a step in the right direction, and can generate new experiences to shape and influence the technology design, development &amp; business models likely to surface as a result of this convergence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree with jrx35. This is certainly a step in the right direction, and can generate new experiences to shape and influence the technology design, development &amp; business models likely to surface as a result of this convergence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrx35</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrx35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that while everyone is bashing BT on this, it&#039;s still a notable step.  Admittedly, it&#039;s a beta trial and even still, experience can be gained from it.

The key thing is that it&#039;s not a wifi handset but bluetooth that alleviate the issues of having a wi-fi voip phone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that while everyone is bashing BT on this, it&#8217;s still a notable step.  Admittedly, it&#8217;s a beta trial and even still, experience can be gained from it.</p>
<p>The key thing is that it&#8217;s not a wifi handset but bluetooth that alleviate the issues of having a wi-fi voip phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Geddes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Geddes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/15/bt-fusion-big-time-bt-flop/#comment-104291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure BT&#039;s research shows that when someone takes all three products they never churn.  That&#039;s the dream.

Unfortunately you can&#039;t run a large telco through the undying loyalty of Sid and Doris Bonkers in Neasden alone.  You need volume, not just margin.

Ask Ryanair.  Would people crawl over broken glass butt-naked for BT&#039;s offering?  Need I ask?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure BT&#8217;s research shows that when someone takes all three products they never churn.  That&#8217;s the dream.</p>
<p>Unfortunately you can&#8217;t run a large telco through the undying loyalty of Sid and Doris Bonkers in Neasden alone.  You need volume, not just margin.</p>
<p>Ask Ryanair.  Would people crawl over broken glass butt-naked for BT&#8217;s offering?  Need I ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

