<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype All Hype?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/#comment-16709</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/#comment-16709</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In your typical SIP network, the SIP - call signaling - often travels client-server. The client sends its signaling to (or receives its signaling from) a network application server of some sort.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the RTP - the voice - often travels peer-peer. Only the worst NAT scenarios change that -- no different than the supernode bouncing that takes place in the Skype world.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When traveling peer-peer between two clients that are capable of dealing with &quot;full broadband voice&quot; SIP clients can sound like Skype clients. Compressed voice comes into play in bandwidth challenged scenarios. The other loss of fidelity comes in the handoff to the PSTN at the TDM media gateways. Of course, this should come as no surprise to the Skype user who buys Skype-Out time and finds out what a PSTN handoff sounds like.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your typical SIP network, the SIP &#8211; call signaling &#8211; often travels client-server. The client sends its signaling to (or receives its signaling from) a network application server of some sort.</p>

<p>But the RTP &#8211; the voice &#8211; often travels peer-peer. Only the worst NAT scenarios change that &#8212; no different than the supernode bouncing that takes place in the Skype world.</p>

<p>When traveling peer-peer between two clients that are capable of dealing with &#8220;full broadband voice&#8221; SIP clients can sound like Skype clients. Compressed voice comes into play in bandwidth challenged scenarios. The other loss of fidelity comes in the handoff to the PSTN at the TDM media gateways. Of course, this should come as no surprise to the Skype user who buys Skype-Out time and finds out what a PSTN handoff sounds like.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoinger  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Dialpad, Yahoo! and Skype  &#8212; PC-to-PC and PC-to-PSTN VoIP</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/#comment-16708</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoinger  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Dialpad, Yahoo! and Skype  &#8212; PC-to-PC and PC-to-PSTN VoIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/#comment-16708</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] ere and Dialpad&#8217;s here.   The Current VoIP Market    Skype claims to have 41 million users &#8212; again, whatever a &#8220;user&#8221; is. U.S. residential  [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ere and Dialpad&#8217;s here.   The Current VoIP Market    Skype claims to have 41 million users &#8212; again, whatever a &#8220;user&#8221; is. U.S. residential  [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazaarz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/#comment-16707</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazaarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/06/13/skype-all-hype/#comment-16707</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is Skype overhyped?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A fascinating technical article by Aswath Rao and referenced by Om Malik drips tepid water on Skype&#039;s technical claims. Does it matter? We think so - but not necessarily for technical reasons....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Skype overhyped?</strong></p>

<p>A fascinating technical article by Aswath Rao and referenced by Om Malik drips tepid water on Skype&#8217;s technical claims. Does it matter? We think so &#8211; but not necessarily for technical reasons&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
