SBC, Verizon ready to take on the cities

Om Malik, Wednesday, June 1, 2005 at 7:10 AM PT Comments (5)

SBC and Verizon may have received a little setback in their IPTV efforts from the Texas legislature but they are not giving up, and are now preparing for a fight with the cities, according to Austin American-Statesman. They will start offering the services to the consumers, regardless. Their argument - well since phone companies pay the right of the way for their phone service to the cities why do they have to pay the franchise fees for video. After all IPTV is not TV, but Internet service. (I wonder why go the legislature-way, after all… something doesn’t add up!) City officials bristle at this argument.

“That could certainly trigger some legal ramifications,” said Rondella Hawkins, telecommunications and regulatory affairs officer for the City of Austin. “They are still going to be using our right of ways. I don’t understand why they don’t need to get a cable franchise if Time Warner (Cable) and Grande (Communications Inc.) do.”

Still, a whole lot of mudslinging going at this time between cities, the bells and the cable companies.

Rating: 40% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

1 trackback so far

June 6th, 2005
5:34 AM PT

SBC, Verizon ready to take on the cities

[Source: Om Malik’s Broadband Blog] quoted: SBC and Verizon may have received a little setback in their IPTV efforts from the Texas legislature but they are not giving up, and are now preparing for a fight with the cities, according to Austin Amer…

4 comments so far

June 1st, 2005
9:25 AM PT
charliesierra said:

Kudo’s to SBC.

Finally putting the middle finger to good use.

They only worst player than the telcos has been the government.

If the local commies (er. government) doesn’t have a say in whether iTunes, amazon or ebay can appear on citizens computers, then why should they have anything to do with IPTV, which is just streaming video.

RBOCs villifing the local tyrants.
ROTFLMO.
Only in America, baby.

June 1st, 2005
10:20 AM PT
Dan said:

I am not one to side with the telco industry, but doesn’t cable get to claim they are not a phone company when offering VoIP? Telco should be allowed to claim they are not a cable company by offering IPTV.

June 1st, 2005
1:33 PM PT
Bored said:

I think it’s about time that the cable companies’ get a little more competition. I do think that there should be some type of structure setup for remuneration to the cities so that they do not lose revenue when customers jump ship from Cable to Telco Video-over-Fiber services.

June 2nd, 2005
6:59 PM PT

Feel free to use this site to find all Broadband Internet Providers available in your area…

(link)

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

iPhone 3G Issues: The Plot Thickens
Om Malik, August 14, 52 comments
Why Blogs Need To Be Social
Om Malik, August 14, 51 comments
How Do You Rate NBC’s Olympics?
Om Malik, August 17, 45 comments
Why The MMORPG Subscription-Based Business Model Is Broken
Wagner James Au, August 16, 28 comments
Open Thread: Are You Happy With Apple Support?
Om Malik, August 18, 24 comments

Highest Rated

F|R: How to Avoid Feature Creep with Your Software Apps
Jason Putorti, August 17, 76%
Top 5 Reasons Business Execs Fail to Work Effectively with Product and Engineering Execs
Kevin Fortuna and Marty Abbott, August 16, 70%
Missing Muxtape? Try 8Tracks. It’s Better
Om Malik, August 19, 78%
Meet GigaLogue, Roll Your Own NewsFeeds
Om Malik, August 18, 60%
Why Blogs Need To Be Social
Om Malik, August 14, 59%
Close
E-mail It