<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Switchers &#8211; Fewer Than Expected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blake Ross</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15362</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 22:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15362</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s not forget that 11% is a staggeringly high number of people, not only given the timeframe, but given the enormous size of the market. So I would say that people &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; switching in large numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that 11% is a staggeringly high number of people, not only given the timeframe, but given the enormous size of the market. So I would say that people <em>are</em> switching in large numbers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Evangelost</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15345</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Evangelost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om I have to say that I am a happy user of Opera.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As well as easier to user than both FF and IE it is fast secure and in quite moments I can control it using voice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have been a happy user since my days using the PSION Netbook over five years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om I have to say that I am a happy user of Opera.</p>

<p>As well as easier to user than both FF and IE it is fast secure and in quite moments I can control it using voice.</p>

<p>Have been a happy user since my days using the PSION Netbook over five years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Leathern</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15331</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Leathern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would love to see the cross-tabs of these users by sophistication level, years of online experience, AOL status... I&#039;m betting that the (relatively speaking) online smarties are going for Firefox. I do think it may take quite a while for this to trickle down. In fact, I just this weekend convinced my wife to switch to Firefox. Many people still have no idea that it&#039;s an issue - many I believe think its part of the Windows system, obviously.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve also been working hard on some really cool Firefox plug-in features over at LinkedIn, including our JobsInsider which appears on job sites like Monster and lets you see who you&#039;re connected to when you&#039;re looking at a job listing. It&#039;s definitely worth checking out if you are a big Firefox fan... www.linkedin.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see the cross-tabs of these users by sophistication level, years of online experience, AOL status&#8230; I&#8217;m betting that the (relatively speaking) online smarties are going for Firefox. I do think it may take quite a while for this to trickle down. In fact, I just this weekend convinced my wife to switch to Firefox. Many people still have no idea that it&#8217;s an issue &#8211; many I believe think its part of the Windows system, obviously.</p>

<p>We&#8217;ve also been working hard on some really cool Firefox plug-in features over at LinkedIn, including our JobsInsider which appears on job sites like Monster and lets you see who you&#8217;re connected to when you&#8217;re looking at a job listing. It&#8217;s definitely worth checking out if you are a big Firefox fan&#8230; <a href="http://www.linkedin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Longren</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15275</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Longren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 01:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Browsers: Fewer Switching&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;Fewer people than expected are actually switching to using something other than Internet Explorer for web browsing.  I kept hearing all over the place that Firefox usage would grow to overtake IE.  This may still happen, but it&#8217;s a long ways off...
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Browsers: Fewer Switching</strong></p>

<pre><code>Fewer people than expected are actually switching to using something other than Internet Explorer for web browsing.  I kept hearing all over the place that Firefox usage would grow to overtake IE.  This may still happen, but it&amp;#8217;s a long ways off...
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbelkin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15273</link>
		<dc:creator>jbelkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15273</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The average PC user has no idea where their download sklnmklm8567vmvl.exe goes, let alone know how to install it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average PC user has no idea where their download sklnmklm8567vmvl.exe goes, let alone know how to install it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connected Internet - Broadband, Mobile and Gaming News Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15318</link>
		<dc:creator>Connected Internet - Broadband, Mobile and Gaming News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15318</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Browser Switchers - Fewer Than Expected&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Firefox is definitely my browser of choice because of its flexibility,
additional security and some cool features.&#160; However, it appears
that Joe Public doesn&#039;t understand this.&#160; In a study by ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Browser Switchers &#8211; Fewer Than Expected</strong></p>

<p>Firefox is definitely my browser of choice because of its flexibility,
additional security and some cool features.&nbsp; However, it appears
that Joe Public doesn&#8217;t understand this.&nbsp; In a study by &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan steyn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15307</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan steyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 20:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Better security is often put forward as the reason for the rapid growth of Firefox. These findings seem show that security may not be the main driver.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So now MSFT is working on IE 7.0 with the objective of ... improving security (and offering tabbed browsing.) But neither of these is why I switched from IE 6.0.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FF is simply a better browser. IE 7.0 won&#039;t win me back.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better security is often put forward as the reason for the rapid growth of Firefox. These findings seem show that security may not be the main driver.</p>

<p>So now MSFT is working on IE 7.0 with the objective of &#8230; improving security (and offering tabbed browsing.) But neither of these is why I switched from IE 6.0.</p>

<p>FF is simply a better browser. IE 7.0 won&#8217;t win me back.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msteinbaugh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15284</link>
		<dc:creator>msteinbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 15:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/05/31/browser-switchers-fewer-than-expected/#comment-15284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s exactly right. Most people still think their computer problems happen from malicious e-mails. The funny thing is watching a casual user run an installer program. Most don&#039;t read the dialog boxes at all -- they just click &quot;next&quot; to get through the installer as fast as possible. In the meantime, companies such as AOL and even Adobe have loaded the installer with bloat/spyware that will get installed on your machine unless you read the prompts carefully.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly right. Most people still think their computer problems happen from malicious e-mails. The funny thing is watching a casual user run an installer program. Most don&#8217;t read the dialog boxes at all &#8212; they just click &#8220;next&#8221; to get through the installer as fast as possible. In the meantime, companies such as AOL and even Adobe have loaded the installer with bloat/spyware that will get installed on your machine unless you read the prompts carefully.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
