<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problems with Off Brand Sub $50 Phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: manish</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would take it a bit further. People in these markets, who can afford it less, are &#039;more&#039; conscious of having the right brand association ! Especially for certain &#039;key&#039; products which are, sort of, status judgment criteria in their society ! And the list of these key items varies in different regions/societies/cultures.

Therefore Nokia is more popular in India. Ofcourse the fact that people have less money, remains. So Nokia has to bring down its prices for that market, but are still costlier than most other brands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take it a bit further. People in these markets, who can afford it less, are &#8216;more&#8217; conscious of having the right brand association ! Especially for certain &#8216;key&#8217; products which are, sort of, status judgment criteria in their society ! And the list of these key items varies in different regions/societies/cultures.</p>
<p>Therefore Nokia is more popular in India. Ofcourse the fact that people have less money, remains. So Nokia has to bring down its prices for that market, but are still costlier than most other brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well that&#039;s the point i was trying to make - people just read half the story and then react. they don&#039;t take into long term implications -]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well that&#8217;s the point i was trying to make &#8211; people just read half the story and then react. they don&#8217;t take into long term implications -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand Jain</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anand Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you read &quot;The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid&quot; book, it does mention that poor people also like to own and associate with brands. They also dont like cheapo/crappy stuff. Although they might not have the same purchasing power parity, they still like to own high-end stuff (or even low cost products, but having the same brand resonance as the original high priced ones).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read &#8220;The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid&#8221; book, it does mention that poor people also like to own and associate with brands. They also dont like cheapo/crappy stuff. Although they might not have the same purchasing power parity, they still like to own high-end stuff (or even low cost products, but having the same brand resonance as the original high priced ones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/04/20/the-problems-with-off-brand-sub-50-phones/#comment-102172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That 1813 looks ok to me. Looks like a Siemens, in fact. Looks wise, I&#039;d take it over a Nokia 1100 (which is one of Nokia&#039;s uglier phones). Still, your point about branding is valid. It&#039;s the Air Jordan effect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 1813 looks ok to me. Looks like a Siemens, in fact. Looks wise, I&#8217;d take it over a Nokia 1100 (which is one of Nokia&#8217;s uglier phones). Still, your point about branding is valid. It&#8217;s the Air Jordan effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

