http://gigaom.com/2005/04/19/verizons-not-so-naked-dsl/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://gigaom.com/2005/04/19/verizons-not-so-naked-dsl/#comment-102145 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:41:28 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/04/19/verizons-not-so-naked-dsl/#comment-102145 Except when you call them to make it happen, the reps have no idea this new policy is even in effect. A call to the VA spokewoman in Baltimore yielded no response.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/04/19/verizons-not-so-naked-dsl/#comment-102144 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:18:36 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/04/19/verizons-not-so-naked-dsl/#comment-102144 Okay the way it is not naked is you can’t order a DSL connection only from verizon from now. if you are an existing customer, you can drop your voice plan, and then keep dsl. eventually it will all be naked

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/04/19/verizons-not-so-naked-dsl/#comment-102143 Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:47:21 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/04/19/verizons-not-so-naked-dsl/#comment-102143 How is this not naked? Verizon DSL users get DSL without a Verizon phone line. How does Verizon prevent users from canceling a non-Verizon POTS?

]]>