<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Yahoo Got Its Mojo Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Yang se aparta &#124; Qué Vida Esta</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-913361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Yang se aparta &#124; Qué Vida Esta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-913361</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] de crecimiento y esperemos que si llega un nuevo CEO sirva de excusa para darle impulso ¡Hay que recuperar ese mojo! Guardar [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de crecimiento y esperemos que si llega un nuevo CEO sirva de excusa para darle impulso ¡Hay que recuperar ese mojo! Guardar [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Yahoo: Old Wine, Old Label &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-214587</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM Yahoo: Old Wine, Old Label &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-214587</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] has been a vital presence in the Web world for at least a dozen years. It&#8217;s sad to see it without its mojo. While I don&#8217;t buy the line that Yahoo was a check against the evil monolith of Google, Yahoo [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been a vital presence in the Web world for at least a dozen years. It&#8217;s sad to see it without its mojo. While I don&#8217;t buy the line that Yahoo was a check against the evil monolith of Google, Yahoo [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miffed customer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9794</link>
		<dc:creator>miffed customer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9794</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, forget all the hype.  The stock price and the predictions.  Let&#039;s talk about how that all boils down to nothing when it comes to Yahoo&#039;s interface with customers.  Long story short, I signed on with Yahoo&#039;s Web Hosting server for a simple website.  They shut it off for a week on a technical error, and their tech support was so primitive and slow that I switched to another host within that week.  They ignored three desperate pleas for assistance and responded only to my e-mail saying I cancelled their hosting.  (Irony in that they were happy to oblige my request to leave their service!) A waste of 8-bucks, you say?  No, I believe something so simple is being overlooked at Yahoo.  I wouldn&#039;t keep Yahoo stock because it only reflects speculation rather than value.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, forget all the hype.  The stock price and the predictions.  Let&#8217;s talk about how that all boils down to nothing when it comes to Yahoo&#8217;s interface with customers.  Long story short, I signed on with Yahoo&#8217;s Web Hosting server for a simple website.  They shut it off for a week on a technical error, and their tech support was so primitive and slow that I switched to another host within that week.  They ignored three desperate pleas for assistance and responded only to my e-mail saying I cancelled their hosting.  (Irony in that they were happy to oblige my request to leave their service!) A waste of 8-bucks, you say?  No, I believe something so simple is being overlooked at Yahoo.  I wouldn&#8217;t keep Yahoo stock because it only reflects speculation rather than value.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brettsky &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What goes down, must come up.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9793</link>
		<dc:creator>brettsky &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What goes down, must come up.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9793</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Yahoo!, the internet corporate behemoth it&#8217;s ok to like? Does this make me cool for using Yahoo! email for the last several years? Am I ahead of the curve. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahoo!, the internet corporate behemoth it&#8217;s ok to like? Does this make me cool for using Yahoo! email for the last several years? Am I ahead of the curve. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conversations on Organisations &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo - past, present and future</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9792</link>
		<dc:creator>Conversations on Organisations &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo - past, present and future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 16:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Om Malik called it the moment Yahoo got its mojo back. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik called it the moment Yahoo got its mojo back. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iceman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9790</link>
		<dc:creator>Iceman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9790</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As we said elsewhere in this report, we believe Google&#039;s primary competitor and most comparable peer is Yahoo! (YHOO ). Based on our 2004 forecasts, Yahoo recently traded at 14 times revenues, 21 times gross profit, and 46 times EBITDA. If Google were to trade between discounts and premiums to these multiples of 10%, its valuation would be $33 billion to $40 billion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we said elsewhere in this report, we believe Google&#8217;s primary competitor and most comparable peer is Yahoo! (YHOO ). Based on our 2004 forecasts, Yahoo recently traded at 14 times revenues, 21 times gross profit, and 46 times EBITDA. If Google were to trade between discounts and premiums to these multiples of 10%, its valuation would be $33 billion to $40 billion.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Tripping the Yahoo Fantastic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9788</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Tripping the Yahoo Fantastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9788</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Mojo is still at work, six months later. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mojo is still at work, six months later. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seekXL</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9786</link>
		<dc:creator>seekXL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9786</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great article by Om Malik. Yahoo Search is now my search engine of choice. And their bots seem to index my pages faster than Google&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;greetings
Markus&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article by Om Malik. Yahoo Search is now my search engine of choice. And their bots seem to index my pages faster than Google</p>

<p>greetings
Markus</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Bhardwaj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9784</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish Bhardwaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9784</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BLOGS ARE NOW GETTING ABUSED&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Blogs have now become a big business. People are now blogging without having  any worthy thing to blog. Since one person can write or blog so much per day or per week people, having the ability to raise capital, are raise capital by using the hot &quot;Blog name&quot; and hot &quot;Outsourcing&quot; name to raise capital to outsource blogging to produce mass number  of blogs of garbage quality of conglomerte type of subjects. Idea is to outsource blogging to produce a minimum of 1000 to 10,000 blogs per day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You do not have to be a Blogger or Yahoo to exploit the Blogging. People, who make money from blogging, are people who produce blogs on wholesale scale and who can get advertizers to put up their banners on these blogs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But most people, who blog, make no money. They put up &quot;Ads by Goooooooooooooooble&quot; on their blogs. The advertizers pay google for the Adwords. But Most of these ads produce only impressions and Google pays nothing for these impressions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All the Blogs produce are dreams for most people. Sweet dreams may be. But nothing that will buy any blogger a vacation in Bahamas or an INFINITI SUV.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;HAPPY DREAMS BLOGGERS. BLOG ON HAPPY DREAMS&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BLOGS ARE NOW GETTING ABUSED</p>

<p>Blogs have now become a big business. People are now blogging without having  any worthy thing to blog. Since one person can write or blog so much per day or per week people, having the ability to raise capital, are raise capital by using the hot &#8220;Blog name&#8221; and hot &#8220;Outsourcing&#8221; name to raise capital to outsource blogging to produce mass number  of blogs of garbage quality of conglomerte type of subjects. Idea is to outsource blogging to produce a minimum of 1000 to 10,000 blogs per day.</p>

<p>You do not have to be a Blogger or Yahoo to exploit the Blogging. People, who make money from blogging, are people who produce blogs on wholesale scale and who can get advertizers to put up their banners on these blogs.</p>

<p>But most people, who blog, make no money. They put up &#8220;Ads by Goooooooooooooooble&#8221; on their blogs. The advertizers pay google for the Adwords. But Most of these ads produce only impressions and Google pays nothing for these impressions.</p>

<p>All the Blogs produce are dreams for most people. Sweet dreams may be. But nothing that will buy any blogger a vacation in Bahamas or an INFINITI SUV.</p>

<p>HAPPY DREAMS BLOGGERS. BLOG ON HAPPY DREAMS</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Bhardwaj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9782</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish Bhardwaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9782</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know what&#039;s a mojo or mojo break. I know, at least from oft repeated stories, that yahoo got its search engine break from Google. I don&#039;t know why googl is getting the credit for yahoo searches. Google did not write the software for its search engine either. I think it used open source software. Anyway Yahoo quit using the Google earch engine afterit decided to go public. Yahoo acquired a floundering search Engine Company whose stock was a flier in hot internet days that was in bankruptcy reorganization or was about to do so and its shares of common stock were like a dime a dozen.. May be not a dime a dozen but no more expensive than 50 cents a dozen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe yahoo has been using that search engine. Ofcourse that is an alleged story. Yahoo is a great company. It has forums that allow you to open your heart and vent your steam and float your ideas. Google also had great forums. But I think they have vanished.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But it is wrong to think that Yahoo need any break after it became a public company decades before Google became a household word. Google must thank yahoo for making it a household word. Now Iwon. com is using its searches and pays hefty cash prizes to keep the name of google searches alive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the time has long been here to change all this and send these big name Internet Companies to a dog house. That&#039;s where they belong. they have had their day. They saw the opportunity created by Bill Gates as further opened by the likes of Steve  Case of AOL fame. They took the short route out. they wanted to create something original and they sent the   Companies like Comshare and Tymshare that had high flying shares to doghouse. Of course these companies had nothing to do with internet. But they had a method of remate operation of main frame computer that would have made a better business model for internet service providers than Steve Case &amp; Netscape developed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Time has come to go back to that model. a case has been made for that model at &lt;a href=&quot;http://newerawisp.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NEW INTERNET SERVICE MODEL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s a mojo or mojo break. I know, at least from oft repeated stories, that yahoo got its search engine break from Google. I don&#8217;t know why googl is getting the credit for yahoo searches. Google did not write the software for its search engine either. I think it used open source software. Anyway Yahoo quit using the Google earch engine afterit decided to go public. Yahoo acquired a floundering search Engine Company whose stock was a flier in hot internet days that was in bankruptcy reorganization or was about to do so and its shares of common stock were like a dime a dozen.. May be not a dime a dozen but no more expensive than 50 cents a dozen.</p>

<p>I believe yahoo has been using that search engine. Ofcourse that is an alleged story. Yahoo is a great company. It has forums that allow you to open your heart and vent your steam and float your ideas. Google also had great forums. But I think they have vanished.</p>

<p>But it is wrong to think that Yahoo need any break after it became a public company decades before Google became a household word. Google must thank yahoo for making it a household word. Now Iwon. com is using its searches and pays hefty cash prizes to keep the name of google searches alive.</p>

<p>But the time has long been here to change all this and send these big name Internet Companies to a dog house. That&#8217;s where they belong. they have had their day. They saw the opportunity created by Bill Gates as further opened by the likes of Steve  Case of AOL fame. They took the short route out. they wanted to create something original and they sent the   Companies like Comshare and Tymshare that had high flying shares to doghouse. Of course these companies had nothing to do with internet. But they had a method of remate operation of main frame computer that would have made a better business model for internet service providers than Steve Case &amp; Netscape developed.</p>

<p>Time has come to go back to that model. a case has been made for that model at <a href="http://newerawisp.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">NEW INTERNET SERVICE MODEL</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris De La Rosa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9781</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris De La Rosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9781</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great summary. Always a pleasure to read. Isn;t it great to have them competing..great options for us as users.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary. Always a pleasure to read. Isn;t it great to have them competing..great options for us as users.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johns Wooding's Blog on Zen Business Concepts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9780</link>
		<dc:creator>Johns Wooding's Blog on Zen Business Concepts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9780</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yahoogle or Goo-ahoo? Or Googosoft?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is Yahoo! trying to out Google, Google? Yahoogle!
Amongst the almost old fashioned hype about the Google IPO Yahoo! seems to have been doing business in a considered and mature way. A good example of this is the acquisition of Flickr, the social photo...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoogle or Goo-ahoo? Or Googosoft?</strong></p>

<p>Is Yahoo! trying to out Google, Google? Yahoogle!
Amongst the almost old fashioned hype about the Google IPO Yahoo! seems to have been doing business in a considered and mature way. A good example of this is the acquisition of Flickr, the social photo&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uber Blah!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9779</link>
		<dc:creator>Uber Blah!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 06:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9779</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo! draws more unique visitors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;Yahoo! sites drew more unique visitors than MSN, Google or America Online-branded sites.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In May, it had nearly 97 million unique Web users, who spent an average of three hours and one minute on the site for the month. Among those visitors, Yahoo&amp;#8217...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo! draws more unique visitors</strong></p>

<pre><code>Yahoo! sites drew more unique visitors than MSN, Google or America Online-branded sites.
</code></pre>

<p>In May, it had nearly 97 million unique Web users, who spent an average of three hours and one minute on the site for the month. Among those visitors, Yahoo&amp;#8217&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9778</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9778</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] some announcements, and baseball musings                          Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found                                                                                                        In Random Access &#124;              Saturday, June 18 at 1:54 PM                                      [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some announcements, and baseball musings                          Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found                                                                                                        In Random Access |              Saturday, June 18 at 1:54 PM                                      [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9776</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#187; Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9776</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] some announcements, and baseball musings                          Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found                                                                                                In Random Access &#124;              Saturday, June 18 at 1:54 PM                                              [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some announcements, and baseball musings                          Yahoo&#8217;s MoJo Found                                                                                                In Random Access |              Saturday, June 18 at 1:54 PM                                              [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey Norton! - Ken Norton's blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9775</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey Norton! - Ken Norton's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 04:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/26/how-yahoo-got-its-mojo-back/#comment-9775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Yahoo! no more - leaving Yahoo! for JotSpot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ah, freedom.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Yahoo! no more &#8211; leaving Yahoo! for JotSpot</strong></p>

<p>Ah, freedom.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
