Comments on: DOCSIS 2.0 – Don’t Count Cable Guys Out http://gigaom.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:08:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Om Malik http://gigaom.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-101250 Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:40:35 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-101250 point well taken. should have been clear in the post. sorry about that.

]]> By: peter percosan http://gigaom.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-101249 Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:28:56 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-101249 Hi -
A couple of comments. The bulk of the current cable deployment is HFC, not COAX, which is very similar to the fibre/copper approach that the LECs are considering.
DOCSIS 2.0 addressed the limitations of the upstream, the downstream is the same as DOCSIS 1.1.
Later,
Peter

]]>