http://gigaom.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/ Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://gigaom.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-9533 Om Malik Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:40:35 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-9533 <p>point well taken. should have been clear in the post. sorry about that.</p> point well taken. should have been clear in the post. sorry about that.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-9531 peter percosan Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:28:56 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/25/docsis-20-dont-count-cable-guys-out/#comment-9531 <p>Hi - A couple of comments. The bulk of the current cable deployment is HFC, not COAX, which is very similar to the fibre/copper approach that the LECs are considering. DOCSIS 2.0 addressed the limitations of the upstream, the downstream is the same as DOCSIS 1.1. Later, Peter</p> Hi - A couple of comments. The bulk of the current cable deployment is HFC, not COAX, which is very similar to the fibre/copper approach that the LECs are considering. DOCSIS 2.0 addressed the limitations of the upstream, the downstream is the same as DOCSIS 1.1. Later, Peter

]]>