<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why SBC Really Bought AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/why-sbc-really-bought-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/why-sbc-really-bought-att/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Davison</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/why-sbc-really-bought-att/#comment-101086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Davison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/why-sbc-really-bought-att/#comment-101086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where is the headquarter&#039;s for AT&amp;T. What state is they&#039;re home office located in?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the headquarter&#8217;s for AT&amp;T. What state is they&#8217;re home office located in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Ma Bell Rides Again</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/why-sbc-really-bought-att/#comment-101085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Ma Bell Rides Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/why-sbc-really-bought-att/#comment-101085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] For last six months, I have been arguing that SBC got a real bargain in AT&amp;T. Not only did AT&amp;T bring to the table a fully modernized network, corporate telecom expertise, but also a company whose operations are on the mend. In the most recent quarter, AT&amp;T posted profits, and painted a better future. But the biggest thing SBC got was the AT&amp;T name. It is worth more than all the cash on the giant&#8217;s books. And it certainly is more memorable than SBC which is a regional brand that reminds you&#8230; (add your own pun!) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For last six months, I have been arguing that SBC got a real bargain in AT&amp;T. Not only did AT&amp;T bring to the table a fully modernized network, corporate telecom expertise, but also a company whose operations are on the mend. In the most recent quarter, AT&amp;T posted profits, and painted a better future. But the biggest thing SBC got was the AT&amp;T name. It is worth more than all the cash on the giant&#8217;s books. And it certainly is more memorable than SBC which is a regional brand that reminds you&#8230; (add your own pun!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

