<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr-hoo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 AM Pacific &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Company of One</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[6 AM Pacific &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Company of One]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] internet with just a few developers. It took in no venture capital and sold itself to Yahoo for an estimated $30-35 million. An extreme case of a one-man company already looking at a billion dollar plus valuation is a site [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] internet with just a few developers. It took in no venture capital and sold itself to Yahoo for an estimated $30-35 million. An extreme case of a one-man company already looking at a billion dollar plus valuation is a site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything you wanted to know about Flickr but were afraid to ask</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everything you wanted to know about Flickr but were afraid to ask]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] acquired Flickr in March 2005 for a price tag of around US$35M according to Om Malik. Today’s Flickr value is probably closer to the Billions than the Millions. It’s truly an [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] acquired Flickr in March 2005 for a price tag of around US$35M according to Om Malik. Today’s Flickr value is probably closer to the Billions than the Millions. It’s truly an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somewhat Frank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Somewhat Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MyBlogLog Slips In Pictures Feature?&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MyBlogLog, the product focused on creating a connected blogosphere community, appears to have slipped a new pictures feature into the product. MyBlogLog users can now upload images to their account to be on displayed for the rest of the community&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MyBlogLog Slips In Pictures Feature?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>MyBlogLog, the product focused on creating a connected blogosphere community, appears to have slipped a new pictures feature into the product. MyBlogLog users can now upload images to their account to be on displayed for the rest of the community&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Profile: BuzzNet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechCrunch &#187; Profile: BuzzNet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 04:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] about Press, media  Corporate Site Faq On Technorati adding BuzzNet pics Technorati Tag: Buzznet Bitsplitter on buzznet v. flickr Om Malik on buzznet Furl Search on Buzznet [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about Press, media  Corporate Site Faq On Technorati adding BuzzNet pics Technorati Tag: Buzznet Bitsplitter on buzznet v. flickr Om Malik on buzznet Furl Search on Buzznet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Profile: BuzzNet&lt;/strong&gt;

	Company: BuzzNet

	Founded: March 2003
	Location:
	Buzznet, Inc.
2404 Wilshire Blvd. #11b
Los Angeles, CA 90057
(213) 252-8999 phone
(213) 252-8955 fax
	What is it?
	BuzzNet is a photo-sharing community. It&#8217;s hard to talk about BuzzNet without...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Profile: BuzzNet</strong></p>
<p>	Company: BuzzNet</p>
<p>	Founded: March 2003<br />
	Location:<br />
	Buzznet, Inc.<br />
2404 Wilshire Blvd. #11b<br />
Los Angeles, CA 90057<br />
(213) 252-8999 phone<br />
(213) 252-8955 fax<br />
	What is it?<br />
	BuzzNet is a photo-sharing community. It&#8217;s hard to talk about BuzzNet without&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnie Manzari</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnnie Manzari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The Fragmented Consumer Photography Space&lt;/strong&gt;

 I came across the new website for Layers Magazine recently. It&#039;s focused on tips and tricks for Adobe&#039;s professional products and features an overview of Vanishing Point that&#039;s worth checking out. What does this have to do with fragmentation...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Fragmented Consumer Photography Space</strong></p>
<p> I came across the new website for Layers Magazine recently. It&#8217;s focused on tips and tricks for Adobe&#8217;s professional products and features an overview of Vanishing Point that&#8217;s worth checking out. What does this have to do with fragmentation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Like It Matters</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Like It Matters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;3Q&#039;s:  Om Malik&lt;/strong&gt;

Om Malik covered broadband before broadband was cool. As a founding editor at Forbes.com, a senior writer at Red Herring (the *real* Red Herring as he would say), and as an invesment analyst during a stint at a VC firm....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>3Q&#8217;s:  Om Malik</strong></p>
<p>Om Malik covered broadband before broadband was cool. As a founding editor at Forbes.com, a senior writer at Red Herring (the *real* Red Herring as he would say), and as an invesment analyst during a stint at a VC firm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron wall</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aaron wall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[as far as Cnet &amp; News.com not crediting sources, here is a good example post on a friends site. http://www.threadwatch.org/node/1208]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as far as Cnet &amp; News.com not crediting sources, here is a good example post on a friends site. <a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/1208" rel="nofollow">http://www.threadwatch.org/node/1208</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Spencer's Scatterings</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephan Spencer's Scatterings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 05:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo! buys Flickr. Damn that was a smart purchase!&lt;/strong&gt;

No secret that I think Flickr is hot stuff (just refer back to my recent posts about Flickr here and here). It&#039;s definitely Web 2.0 material. Flickr investors like Esther Dyson must be pretty happy right now, but Yahoo! stockholders should be even hap...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo! buys Flickr. Damn that was a smart purchase!</strong></p>
<p>No secret that I think Flickr is hot stuff (just refer back to my recent posts about Flickr here and here). It&#8217;s definitely Web 2.0 material. Flickr investors like Esther Dyson must be pretty happy right now, but Yahoo! stockholders should be even hap&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleem</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaleem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 05:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo-Flickr deal: $30 million or $35 million? Less?&lt;/strong&gt;

 Robert &quot;Scobleizer&quot; Scoble asked the question: &quot;How much was Flickr paid?&quot; Depending on whom you believe, as low as $15 million or as high as $30-$35 million.

SiliconBeat/Mercury News&#039; Michael Bazeley comments on&#160; the Yahoo-Flickr deal:
...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo-Flickr deal: $30 million or $35 million? Less?</strong></p>
<p> Robert &#8220;Scobleizer&#8221; Scoble asked the question: &#8220;How much was Flickr paid?&#8221; Depending on whom you believe, as low as $15 million or as high as $30-$35 million.</p>
<p>SiliconBeat/Mercury News&#8217; Michael Bazeley comments on&nbsp; the Yahoo-Flickr deal:<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denken Über</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denken Über]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;El precio de Flickr!&lt;/strong&gt;

Se está reportando y rumoreando que Yahoo! para comprar a Flickr puso entre u$s30 y u$s35 millones de dólares &quot;on the table&quot;, nada de stocks.

Pero como..  ¿¿Vuelven los 90 y nadie me avisó??...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>El precio de Flickr!</strong></p>
<p>Se está reportando y rumoreando que Yahoo! para comprar a Flickr puso entre u$s30 y u$s35 millones de dólares &#8220;on the table&#8221;, nada de stocks.</p>
<p>Pero como..  ¿¿Vuelven los 90 y nadie me avisó??&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexander</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alexander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$35 Million for all that Flickr Hype?

That is probably less than a penny per fawning article/blog in the last 15 months....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$35 Million for all that Flickr Hype?</p>
<p>That is probably less than a penny per fawning article/blog in the last 15 months&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rowland</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Rowland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Flickr deal brings to light more details of Yahoo! and their current strategy as it relates to RSS (and Media RSS).  A quote from Caterina Fake is very telling:

âThe things that were important to us were: being open, building
innovative stuff and kicking ass. Were these people OUR people?
Yes. See the stuff Yahoo&#039;s announced recently (including, of
course,this)? They&#039;re evolving in really interesting ways --
and from our look inside, we know that there&#039;s a lot more
coming.â?

I believe this is the first step in a series of efforts by Yahoo! to focus a lot more attention on âcitizenâs mediaâ?-type products and services.  Theyâve integrated a relatively simple and effective RSS feed reader into their my.yahoo.com and theyâre certainly not going to stop there.  Flickr is a natural extension of this strategy and will be integrated directly into my.yahoo.com.  (I would expect some promising TV/video integration shortly.)  The bottom line is that Yahoo! has gotten religion on the whole idea that consumers are also producers of digital media (and that this market may someday rival the existing mass-market for digital content).  Expect my.yahoo.com to feature very prominently in Yahoo!âs overall business plan and expect to see a whole range of open media aggregation efforts in the near future.  (That Semel guy isnât following the path that most Hollywood execs would have.  I predict Yahoo! will be scary successful in this effort.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Flickr deal brings to light more details of Yahoo! and their current strategy as it relates to RSS (and Media RSS).  A quote from Caterina Fake is very telling:</p>
<p>âThe things that were important to us were: being open, building<br />
innovative stuff and kicking ass. Were these people OUR people?<br />
Yes. See the stuff Yahoo&#8217;s announced recently (including, of<br />
course,this)? They&#8217;re evolving in really interesting ways &#8211;<br />
and from our look inside, we know that there&#8217;s a lot more<br />
coming.â?</p>
<p>I believe this is the first step in a series of efforts by Yahoo! to focus a lot more attention on âcitizenâs mediaâ?-type products and services.  Theyâve integrated a relatively simple and effective RSS feed reader into their my.yahoo.com and theyâre certainly not going to stop there.  Flickr is a natural extension of this strategy and will be integrated directly into my.yahoo.com.  (I would expect some promising TV/video integration shortly.)  The bottom line is that Yahoo! has gotten religion on the whole idea that consumers are also producers of digital media (and that this market may someday rival the existing mass-market for digital content).  Expect my.yahoo.com to feature very prominently in Yahoo!âs overall business plan and expect to see a whole range of open media aggregation efforts in the near future.  (That Semel guy isnât following the path that most Hollywood execs would have.  I predict Yahoo! will be scary successful in this effort.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: View from the Isle - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[View from the Isle - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-101119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Flickr-hoo! Update--$30-35 million&lt;/strong&gt;

Word is this morning that the deal is worth $30-35 million.&#160; SiliconBeat is calling $30, Om Malik is calling $35.&#160; I&#039;m going with Om.&#160;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Flickr-hoo! Update&#8211;$30-35 million</strong></p>
<p>Word is this morning that the deal is worth $30-35 million.&nbsp; SiliconBeat is calling $30, Om Malik is calling $35.&nbsp; I&#8217;m going with Om.&nbsp;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: View from the Isle - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-114717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[View from the Isle - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-114717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Flickr-hoo! Update--$30-35 million&lt;/strong&gt;

Word is this morning that the deal is worth $30-35 million.&#160; SiliconBeat is calling $30, Om Malik is calling $35.&#160; I&#039;m going with Om.&#160;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Flickr-hoo! Update&#8211;$30-35 million</strong></p>
<p>Word is this morning that the deal is worth $30-35 million.&nbsp; SiliconBeat is calling $30, Om Malik is calling $35.&nbsp; I&#8217;m going with Om.&nbsp;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: View from the Isle - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-168461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[View from the Isle - Professional Blogging &#38; Blog Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/03/20/flickr-oo/#comment-168461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Flickr-hoo! Update--$30-35 million&lt;/strong&gt;

Word is this morning that the deal is worth $30-35 million.&#160; SiliconBeat is calling $30, Om Malik is calling $35.&#160; I&#039;m going with Om.&#160;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Flickr-hoo! Update&#8211;$30-35 million</strong></p>
<p>Word is this morning that the deal is worth $30-35 million.&nbsp; SiliconBeat is calling $30, Om Malik is calling $35.&nbsp; I&#8217;m going with Om.&nbsp;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

