<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qwest offers $8 Billion for MCI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/02/24/qwest-offers-8-billion-for-mci/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/24/qwest-offers-8-billion-for-mci/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Castellano</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/24/qwest-offers-8-billion-for-mci/#comment-100474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Castellano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/24/qwest-offers-8-billion-for-mci/#comment-100474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Om, in repsonse to your call for comments here is my take. Qwest will never win the bid, given 1) Verizon&#8217;s ability to slightly raise or modify its bid; and 2) MCI&#8217;s desire to appease shareholders who don&#8217;t want to see the combined company fizzle post merger with a more weakly positioned company. I discuss my view in a little more detail &lt;a href=&quot;http://roer.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/02/qwest_will_not_.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om, in repsonse to your call for comments here is my take. Qwest will never win the bid, given 1) Verizon&#8217;s ability to slightly raise or modify its bid; and 2) MCI&#8217;s desire to appease shareholders who don&#8217;t want to see the combined company fizzle post merger with a more weakly positioned company. I discuss my view in a little more detail <a href="http://roer.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/02/qwest_will_not_.html" rel="nofollow">here.</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflections on Equity Research</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/24/qwest-offers-8-billion-for-mci/#comment-100475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reflections on Equity Research]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/24/qwest-offers-8-billion-for-mci/#comment-100475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Qwest Will Not Win MCI (and a Comment on Outsourcing)&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The following is all based on my opinion only, and should be considered purely as my speculation; it should not be taken as a recommendation to actually buy or sell any stock. &lt;/p&gt;

COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Om Malik
&lt;p&gt;It does expose Q to the machinations or something like that. The collar effectively transfers the risk from the MCI shareholders to the Q shareholders and makes this a much sweeter deal for MCI. Combined with the facts that the GSA has approved Q to bid on government contracts, the Q bid is over $1B more, and the Q deal would be completed in about half the time they still have a very good chance of winning this. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Qwest Will Not Win MCI (and a Comment on Outsourcing)</strong></p>
<p>The following is all based on my opinion only, and should be considered purely as my speculation; it should not be taken as a recommendation to actually buy or sell any stock. </p>
<p>COMMENT:<br />
AUTHOR: Om Malik</p>
<p>It does expose Q to the machinations or something like that. The collar effectively transfers the risk from the MCI shareholders to the Q shareholders and makes this a much sweeter deal for MCI. Combined with the facts that the GSA has approved Q to bid on government contracts, the Q bid is over $1B more, and the Q deal would be completed in about half the time they still have a very good chance of winning this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

