Comments on: Flickr, Yahoo deal in the works? http://gigaom.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:28:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Subzero Blue http://gigaom.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100461 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100461 Yahoo! To Buy Flickr?!

Om Malik reports: Rumors are flying thick and fast in Silicon Valley: Yahoo is all set to buy Ludicorp, the company behind the hot photo blogging web service Flickr, for an undisclosed amount of money. Its not the first time…

]]> By: eclecticism http://gigaom.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100462 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100462 Flickr being bought by…everybody?

For the past few days, rumors have been flying around that Yahoo is buying Flickr. Whatever the truth of the matter, never let it be said that Flickr isn’t handling the rumors with good grace and a sense of humor.

]]> By: NYBANKER blog about offshore outsourcing, software development and online marketing http://gigaom.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100463 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100463 Yahoo to buy Flickr

Om talks about Yahoo buying Flickr…..the deal to be release March 1st according to the lates rumours.
http://www.gigaom.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-marriage-in-the-works/

]]> By: SiliconBeat http://gigaom.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100464 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/23/flickr-yahoo-deal-in-the-works/#comment-100464 Ask Jeeves a company to watch

When word got out last month that Ask Jeeves was buying Bloglines, many bloggers ridiculed the East Bay search engine, and rolled their eyes at the thought of what might happen to their beloved RSS aggregator. But Ask Jeeves is evidently not giving in …

]]>