<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype, VoIP Honeymoon over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype VoIP Honeymoon over &#124; Shed Kits</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype VoIP Honeymoon over &#124; Shed Kits]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 04:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Skype VoIP Honeymoon over   Posted by root 23 hours ago (http://gigaom.com)        Feb 17 2005 i just left a comment on om honeymoon blog post marketing consulting by acs idg technetwork middot powered by wordpress com        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; skype voip honeymoon over [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Skype VoIP Honeymoon over   Posted by root 23 hours ago (<a href="http://gigaom.com" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com</a>)        Feb 17 2005 i just left a comment on om honeymoon blog post marketing consulting by acs idg technetwork middot powered by wordpress com        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | skype voip honeymoon over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r.hafley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[r.hafley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;VONAGE Tel. Comp (  A REAL  SCAM  -FLIM-FLAM -  OPERATION  - With telephone  &quot;BOILER-ROOM &quot; -  Operating  out  of  Alhambra, Ca.- They  promised &amp;  Advertise  that  I  could  keep my  telephone No. (  I had  for  over 30 years ) BUT , as soon  as I  hooked up  their   &quot; ADAPTER&#039; THEY  CALL  A  GIZMO , My  long  time   No.  went into  cyber  space  - never  to  be  returned  to  me again.  My  tel. compantis  informed  me   it   is  lost  forever&#8230; This  leads  me  to  believe  that   VONAGE, also  SUNROCKET digetal  telephone  service, and  Global Crossing  do  have  thier  problems  with  the  big  name companies.    ---  THey  are  spending several millions  of dollers  advertising this  false  information  to  the  unsuspecting  public &#8230; I  thought you  could  pass this  along  to  your  readers.Please, send me a copy of the above comments.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VONAGE Tel. Comp (  A REAL  SCAM  -FLIM-FLAM &#8211;  OPERATION  &#8211; With telephone  &#8220;BOILER-ROOM &#8221; &#8211;  Operating  out  of  Alhambra, Ca.- They  promised &amp;  Advertise  that  I  could  keep my  telephone No. (  I had  for  over 30 years ) BUT , as soon  as I  hooked up  their   &#8221; ADAPTER&#8217; THEY  CALL  A  GIZMO , My  long  time   No.  went into  cyber  space  &#8211; never  to  be  returned  to  me again.  My  tel. compantis  informed  me   it   is  lost  forever&#8230; This  leads  me  to  believe  that   VONAGE, also  SUNROCKET digetal  telephone  service, and  Global Crossing  do  have  thier  problems  with  the  big  name companies.    &#8212;  THey  are  spending several millions  of dollers  advertising this  false  information  to  the  unsuspecting  public &#8230; I  thought you  could  pass this  along  to  your  readers.Please, send me a copy of the above comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Telephony</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Telephony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not a big fan of Skype.

Skype&#039;s core competency is clearly marketing,that&#039;s it.

Jair]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a big fan of Skype.</p>
<p>Skype&#8217;s core competency is clearly marketing,that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>Jair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got skype a few days ago and it&#039;s the best kept secret out there.  I&#039;ve looked at several paid plans and for the money (actually free) skype has them all beat hands down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got skype a few days ago and it&#8217;s the best kept secret out there.  I&#8217;ve looked at several paid plans and for the money (actually free) skype has them all beat hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aswath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aswath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Skype keeps the entry cost low with per minute tariff. But then it is faced with ongoing customer support problems and potential dispute arbitration which grows with the customer base. Contrast this with subscription model (see the post by Tom Evslin). It will be interesting to see how this model fares, now that Teleo is also using this model.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;By the way some of the Bellheads suggested the subscription model some 20 years back but was rejected by Ma invoking political reality. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype keeps the entry cost low with per minute tariff. But then it is faced with ongoing customer support problems and potential dispute arbitration which grows with the customer base. Contrast this with subscription model (see the post by Tom Evslin). It will be interesting to see how this model fares, now that Teleo is also using this model.</p>
<p>By the way some of the Bellheads suggested the subscription model some 20 years back but was rejected by Ma invoking political reality. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I don&#8217;t know if the subscription model makes sense as of right now. unless the whole transport business and the interconnect business is transparent. it would be difficult to make the subscription model work &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if the subscription model makes sense as of right now. unless the whole transport business and the interconnect business is transparent. it would be difficult to make the subscription model work </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Only</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Software Only]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Skype leaves money on the table: not clear how much yet ?&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om just posted a piece Skype, VoIP Honeymoon over? related to what seems to be a growing dissatisfaction of the Skype user community around SkypeOut billing issues, and the quality of the service. He follows up on a CNET piece &lt;/p&gt;

COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Jonathan Boutelle&#039;s home on the net
&lt;p&gt;Skype is going to keep getting into bed with as many companies as possible.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This will increase the value in the buyers eyes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yes that&#8217;s right, they will sell skype&#8230;that was their true plan all along. They will sell it to an entity that doesn;t know anything about voip or the prolems they are having, all they will see is the same thing that skype has conditioned other people to see &#8220;THE NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS&#8221;, which people unlike OM, equate with success. We know it really isn;t so.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Did they want to een provide service? Why do people expect it?..from them I mean. They create, exploit and sell&#8230;thats what they do. And now I guarantee you will see even more companies crawling in their bed in an effort to create the illusion of success to their potential buyer.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I cant believe out of all the communication gurus you have that read this page OM that they don;t know this. They too have been put to sleep by the skype lullaby me thinks.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am SURE that the creators of skype would have taken it as far as they could, i am sure they would have thought it quite cool that they created the end all be all in next generation communications, but how could they KNOW this would be the case. They are experts only in the field of disruption. They are novices in substance and deliverability.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So, predictios.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;-even more partners come onboard&lt;br /&gt; -even more writing takes place about skype&lt;br /&gt; -henshall starts to wonder what voip company to focus on next or if he should even bother.&lt;br /&gt; -people like OM, ISEN, Gedes, Aswath etc&#8230;stay just as they are, &#8216;in the know&#8217;.&lt;br /&gt; -Skype sells.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;craig &lt;/p&gt;

COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Stuart Henshall
&lt;p&gt;I just got through reading Peter Cochrane&#8217;s pro Skype piece. &lt;a href=&#039;http://comment.silicon.com/0,39024711,39127916,00.htm&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://comment.silicon.com/0,39024711,39127916,00.htm&lt;/a&gt; and suggest that it is hardly over. There is too much right. Skype should be more forthcoming however. It takes some digging to find out what&#8217;s creating some of the &#8220;account&#8221; issues. Similarly on the call issues. Some of these could be cleaned up real easily. Let&#8217;s just hope they do it. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Skype leaves money on the table: not clear how much yet ?</strong></p>
<p>Om just posted a piece Skype, VoIP Honeymoon over? related to what seems to be a growing dissatisfaction of the Skype user community around SkypeOut billing issues, and the quality of the service. He follows up on a CNET piece </p>
<p>COMMENT:<br />
AUTHOR: Jonathan Boutelle&#8217;s home on the net</p>
<p>Skype is going to keep getting into bed with as many companies as possible.</p>
<p>This will increase the value in the buyers eyes.</p>
<p>Yes that&#8217;s right, they will sell skype&#8230;that was their true plan all along. They will sell it to an entity that doesn;t know anything about voip or the prolems they are having, all they will see is the same thing that skype has conditioned other people to see &#8220;THE NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS&#8221;, which people unlike OM, equate with success. We know it really isn;t so.</p>
<p>Did they want to een provide service? Why do people expect it?..from them I mean. They create, exploit and sell&#8230;thats what they do. And now I guarantee you will see even more companies crawling in their bed in an effort to create the illusion of success to their potential buyer.</p>
<p>I cant believe out of all the communication gurus you have that read this page OM that they don;t know this. They too have been put to sleep by the skype lullaby me thinks.</p>
<p>I am SURE that the creators of skype would have taken it as far as they could, i am sure they would have thought it quite cool that they created the end all be all in next generation communications, but how could they KNOW this would be the case. They are experts only in the field of disruption. They are novices in substance and deliverability.</p>
<p>So, predictios.</p>
<p>-even more partners come onboard<br /> -even more writing takes place about skype<br /> -henshall starts to wonder what voip company to focus on next or if he should even bother.<br /> -people like OM, ISEN, Gedes, Aswath etc&#8230;stay just as they are, &#8216;in the know&#8217;.<br /> -Skype sells.</p>
<p>craig </p>
<p>COMMENT:<br />
AUTHOR: Stuart Henshall</p>
<p>I just got through reading Peter Cochrane&#8217;s pro Skype piece. <a href='http://comment.silicon.com/0,39024711,39127916,00.htm' rel="nofollow">http://comment.silicon.com/0,39024711,39127916,00.htm</a> and suggest that it is hardly over. There is too much right. Skype should be more forthcoming however. It takes some digging to find out what&#8217;s creating some of the &#8220;account&#8221; issues. Similarly on the call issues. Some of these could be cleaned up real easily. Let&#8217;s just hope they do it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype Journal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skype Journal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Sticks n Stones&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just left a comment on Om&#8217;s honeymoon blog post. What&#8217;s required are creative solutions, not 100&#8217;s of new call center operators. That would be yesterday&#8217;s model and entirely the wrong way to handle these issues. Instead engage you and me in repor&#8230; &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sticks n Stones</strong></p>
<p>I just left a comment on Om&#8217;s honeymoon blog post. What&#8217;s required are creative solutions, not 100&#8217;s of new call center operators. That would be yesterday&#8217;s model and entirely the wrong way to handle these issues. Instead engage you and me in repor&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unbound Spiral</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unbound Spiral]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Sticks n Stones&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just left a comment on Om&#8217;s honeymoon blog post. What&#8217;s required are creative solutions, not 100&#8217;s of new call center operators. That would be yesterday&#8217;s model and entirely the wrong way to handle these issues. Instead engage you and&#8230; &lt;/p&gt;

COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Joey Derek
&lt;p&gt;A friend told me of your site. That´s definitely what i was looking for. I will surely recommend you. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sticks n Stones</strong></p>
<p>I just left a comment on Om&#8217;s honeymoon blog post. What&#8217;s required are creative solutions, not 100&#8217;s of new call center operators. That would be yesterday&#8217;s model and entirely the wrong way to handle these issues. Instead engage you and&#8230; </p>
<p>COMMENT:<br />
AUTHOR: Joey Derek</p>
<p>A friend told me of your site. That´s definitely what i was looking for. I will surely recommend you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo A. Sepúlveda Schulz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodrigo A. Sepúlveda Schulz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Glitches at Skype ?&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cnet has a bad story about Skype&#8217;s PC-to-real-phones service, SkypeOut. In my experience with them, I&#8217;ve only had one glitch: quality of calls to mobiles is sometimes bad for people receving the call (lots of noise on the line), while &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Glitches at Skype ?</strong></p>
<p>Cnet has a bad story about Skype&#8217;s PC-to-real-phones service, SkypeOut. In my experience with them, I&#8217;ve only had one glitch: quality of calls to mobiles is sometimes bad for people receving the call (lots of noise on the line), while </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markiewicz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Markiewicz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/17/skype-voip-honeymoon-over/#comment-100367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Skype coming on strong&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After hearing more and more buzz surrounding Skype, I finally downloaded the software to see what it was all about. As far as VoIP providers go, I think Skype has a great business model - free calls t &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Skype coming on strong</strong></p>
<p>After hearing more and more buzz surrounding Skype, I finally downloaded the software to see what it was all about. As far as VoIP providers go, I think Skype has a great business model &#8211; free calls t </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

