<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texan size battle for Muni Broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whosoever is trying to block broadband, is off their rocker and don&#039;t realize that this is going to make their state unattractive for investment in the long run. Look at the more enlightened stance adopted by rhode island which is trying to get everyone to work together&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whosoever is trying to block broadband, is off their rocker and don&#8217;t realize that this is going to make their state unattractive for investment in the long run. Look at the more enlightened stance adopted by rhode island which is trying to get everyone to work together</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adina Levin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6797</link>
		<dc:creator>Adina Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The incumbent phone and cable companies -- SBC and Time Warner/RR -- are behind the bill. But I didn&#039;t write the previous comment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The incumbent phone and cable companies &#8212; SBC and Time Warner/RR &#8212; are behind the bill. But I didn&#8217;t write the previous comment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Spisak</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6795</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Spisak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The state of Texas is owned by Verizon. This kind of bill doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the least since I am betting Verizon wants to try doing its Fiber to the curb services in its own backyard. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state of Texas is owned by Verizon. This kind of bill doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the least since I am betting Verizon wants to try doing its Fiber to the curb services in its own backyard. </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adina Levin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6796</link>
		<dc:creator>Adina Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/16/texan-size-battle-for-muni-broadband/#comment-6796</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would be thinking more along the lines of San Antonio based SBC/Cingular/ATT as the likely cause of this &#8230; in a state that had already decided to deploy free wi-fi at it&#8217;s state rest stops. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be thinking more along the lines of San Antonio based SBC/Cingular/ATT as the likely cause of this &#8230; in a state that had already decided to deploy free wi-fi at it&#8217;s state rest stops. </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
