<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Fading Flickr? Take Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/02/02/a-fading-flickr-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/02/a-fading-flickr-take-two/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/02/02/a-fading-flickr-take-two/#comment-100190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/02/02/a-fading-flickr-take-two/#comment-100190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Some people see what they want to see, Om. You made a good point regarding a possible peak in the fetching price for flickr. Unfortunately, observers&#8217;/users&#8217; emotions get the best of them (cult of&#8230;) and they take any comments that hint of negativity (nee objectivity/reality) as an affront to their support of said company. Happens all the time. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That said, flickr will sell out. Why hold on long-term? Picasa? Gone in just a few years. Hotmail? Ditto. I give Vonage 2 more years and they&#8217;re out. Can&#8217;t see holding on when there is much personal gain staring you in the face. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people see what they want to see, Om. You made a good point regarding a possible peak in the fetching price for flickr. Unfortunately, observers&#8217;/users&#8217; emotions get the best of them (cult of&#8230;) and they take any comments that hint of negativity (nee objectivity/reality) as an affront to their support of said company. Happens all the time. </p>
<p>That said, flickr will sell out. Why hold on long-term? Picasa? Gone in just a few years. Hotmail? Ditto. I give Vonage 2 more years and they&#8217;re out. Can&#8217;t see holding on when there is much personal gain staring you in the face. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

