Bellster take two

By Om Malik | Tuesday, February 1, 2005 | 12:36 PM PT | 4 comments |

Jeff has a short and sweet response to my original Bellster piece. (JP… you gotta explain what you mean by that!) Now Aswath is suggesting that I don’t get it. Makes me wonder what am I missing here? Because gee-whiz technology not withstanding, the economics of the service is what I cannot decode. Its sort of like what George Gilder used to say about optics, but couldn’t make it work in the real world from a profit-and-loss standpoint.

Digg

Comments (4)

Link to this article using http://om.bit.ly/XqoGU
  • Om:

    Let me first state that (without any qualifications) I didn’t/don’t think that you didn’t get Bellster. After typing the past sentence, I reread my post. I am puzzled how you came to your conclusion. There is something in my composition that is doing the mischief. So let me try to say here what I was trying to say in that post:

    Lots of thought leaders in this field have identified potential issues with bellster. (Even I had identified one of the issues.) But Pulver responds with a single intriguing sentence. So I come up with potential point by point responses from Pulver. Finally I said Andy’s entry doesn’t help us as well. So we continue to be in the dark as to the real idea behind Bellster.

    Om, where do I say that you don’t get it. If anything two of your points – commercial aspect and T&C – are open. But where is economiocal viability in FWD or for that matter in any VoIP services. We have been harping on it for a long time. I hope this clarifies my position to other readers in general and you in particular.

      Reply
  • If Gilder was wrong — and there was too much fiber — why is Verizon putting fiber in the ground right now for Fios ? Possibly because it wasn’t in the right places ?

      Reply
  • Aswath, i guess i read you wrong then. I tried to sum-up a lot of issues in one line – bad move especially when storage is nearly free. I think jeff is not addressing the financial issue of his service. That’s all. I guess you and I need to communicate more and hopefully no more mixed signals :-)

      Reply
  • Victor, not saying Gilder was wrong from a technology stand point, but from an economic standpoint, he helped create a bubble and look where we are at now. putting all the fiber on long haul networks wasn’t smart. Funny stuff right – it all boils down the disaster called the Telecom act of 1996/

      Reply

Linkbacks (1)

  • Om Bellster

    (For you non-norwegians, that’s a pun – “om” means “about” in norwegian)

    It’s amusing – Jeff Pulver’s fwdOUT has been…

    COMMENT:
    AUTHOR: Dominic Eidson

    Om, what happens if fewOUT gains widespread adoptation? Who’ll need the PSTN then? ;)

     

Subscribe to comments feed

Leave a Reply


Post to GigaOM with your Facebook account

Editorial Masthead

Sebastian Rupley
Editor in Chief
Carolyn Pritchard
Managing Editor
Celeste LeCompte
Special Projects Editor
Desiree DeNunzio
Copyeditor
Om Malik
Senior Writer
Stacey Higginbotham
Staff Writer
Ryan Lawler
Staff Writer
Wagner James Au
Contributing Editor
Liz Gannes
Staff Writer
Chris Albrecht
Staff Writer
Katie Fehrenbacher
Staff Writer
Josie Garthwaite
Staff Writer
Close
E-mail It