<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search for People, Just Don&#8217;t Find them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/01/27/search-for-people-just-dont-find-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/27/search-for-people-just-dont-find-them/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Clavier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/27/search-for-people-just-dont-find-them/#comment-5634</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Clavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/01/27/search-for-people-just-dont-find-them/#comment-5634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om, dude, you want to try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.business.com/search/rslt_default.asp?vt=all&amp;type=people&amp;first=georges&amp;last=bush&amp;search=Search&quot;&gt;Georges Bush&lt;/a&gt; but take a breadth beforehand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some classics: #499, #494, #474, #420, #385, #325, #218, #213, #202, #193, #178, #71 (!!!). Reason for going reverse order is that I was trying to check if they got one right, but could not find it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Extracting facts from unstructured sources with a high precision and high recall is difficult, I am granting that. But I am surprised that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eliyon.com&quot;&gt;Eliyon&lt;/a&gt;, the company powering these searches, has spent more time on their inference mechanism to remove more/most of these strange results. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om, dude, you want to try <a href="http://www.business.com/search/rslt_default.asp?vt=all&#038;type=people&#038;first=georges&#038;last=bush&#038;search=Search">Georges Bush</a> but take a breadth beforehand.</p>

<p>Some classics: #499, #494, #474, #420, #385, #325, #218, #213, #202, #193, #178, #71 (!!!). Reason for going reverse order is that I was trying to check if they got one right, but could not find it.</p>

<p>Extracting facts from unstructured sources with a high precision and high recall is difficult, I am granting that. But I am surprised that <a href="http://www.eliyon.com">Eliyon</a>, the company powering these searches, has spent more time on their inference mechanism to remove more/most of these strange results. </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mobile Technology Weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/27/search-for-people-just-dont-find-them/#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mobile Technology Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/01/27/search-for-people-just-dont-find-them/#comment-5635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search for People&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Business.com has an interesting spin on search. You can search for people to put together an historical resume for them. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not that good. While it correctly identified some of the stuff a do/did, I have never been&#8230; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Jeff Clavier&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om, dude, you want to try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.business.com/search/rslt_default.asp?vt=all&amp;type=people&amp;first=georges&amp;last=bush&amp;search=Search&quot;&gt;Georges Bush&lt;/a&gt; but take a breadth beforehand.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some classics: #499, #494, #474, #420, #385, #325, #218, #213, #202, #193, #178, #71 (!!!). Reason for going reverse order is that I was trying to check if they got one of the positions right, but could not find it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Extracting facts from unstructured sources with a high precision and high recall is difficult, I am granting that. But I am surprised that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eliyon.com&quot;&gt;Eliyon&lt;/a&gt;, the company powering these searches, has not spent more time on their inference mechanism to remove more/most of these strange results. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Search for People</strong></p>

<p> Business.com has an interesting spin on search. You can search for people to put together an historical resume for them. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not that good. While it correctly identified some of the stuff a do/did, I have never been&#8230; </p>

<p>COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Jeff Clavier</p>

<p>Om, dude, you want to try <a href="http://www.business.com/search/rslt_default.asp?vt=all&#038;type=people&#038;first=georges&#038;last=bush&#038;search=Search">Georges Bush</a> but take a breadth beforehand.</p>

<p>Some classics: #499, #494, #474, #420, #385, #325, #218, #213, #202, #193, #178, #71 (!!!). Reason for going reverse order is that I was trying to check if they got one of the positions right, but could not find it.</p>

<p>Extracting facts from unstructured sources with a high precision and high recall is difficult, I am granting that. But I am surprised that <a href="http://www.eliyon.com">Eliyon</a>, the company powering these searches, has not spent more time on their inference mechanism to remove more/most of these strange results. </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
