Search for People, Just Don’t Find them

By Om Malik | Thursday, January 27, 2005 | 10:38 PM PT | 1 comment |

Business 2.0 Blog points to new search feature over at Business.com which allows you to find people and create a virtual resume. Or not. Damon over at Business 2.0 typed in his name. Result. Title: Chief Executive Officer, Company: Manic, Date: 9/19/2002 8:01:56 PM. Following his lead, I typed my name and according to them, I am still working for Red Herring, Intuita, IEEE, ….. , till entry #10 which says: Business 2.0. David Dorman, whose company might be bought by SBC, still has the job, the engine tells us. For now. How about Bill Gates? Well I guess world’s richest man doesn’t really need a job. Paris Hilton? She is american actress (in porn movies i assume), founder of Hilton Hotels, and board member of Video nation, the company which was selling her sexcapdes. John Kerry, so shocked by his defeat has now taken up religion and become pastor of the United Christian Church. Try Jeff Bezos and the answer is blah blah…. Company: Beleaguered Amazon! Oh man, even I the most cranky Amazon.com skeptic will say … that’s so 1990s.

Digg

Comments (1)

Link to this article using http://om.bit.ly/TlMrV
  • Om, dude, you want to try Georges Bush but take a breadth beforehand.

    Some classics: #499, #494, #474, #420, #385, #325, #218, #213, #202, #193, #178, #71 (!!!). Reason for going reverse order is that I was trying to check if they got one right, but could not find it.

    Extracting facts from unstructured sources with a high precision and high recall is difficult, I am granting that. But I am surprised that Eliyon, the company powering these searches, has spent more time on their inference mechanism to remove more/most of these strange results.

      Reply

Linkbacks (1)

  • Search for People

    Business.com has an interesting spin on search. You can search for people to put together an historical resume for them. Unfortunately, it’s not that good. While it correctly identified some of the stuff a do/did, I have never been…

    COMMENT:
    AUTHOR: Jeff Clavier

    Om, dude, you want to try Georges Bush but take a breadth beforehand.

    Some classics: #499, #494, #474, #420, #385, #325, #218, #213, #202, #193, #178, #71 (!!!). Reason for going reverse order is that I was trying to check if they got one of the positions right, but could not find it.

    Extracting facts from unstructured sources with a high precision and high recall is difficult, I am granting that. But I am surprised that Eliyon, the company powering these searches, has not spent more time on their inference mechanism to remove more/most of these strange results.

     

Subscribe to comments feed

Leave a Reply


Post to GigaOM with your Facebook account

Editorial Masthead

Sebastian Rupley
Editor in Chief
Carolyn Pritchard
Managing Editor
Celeste LeCompte
Special Projects Editor
Desiree DeNunzio
Copyeditor
Om Malik
Senior Writer
Stacey Higginbotham
Staff Writer
Ryan Lawler
Staff Writer
Wagner James Au
Contributing Editor
Liz Gannes
Staff Writer
Chris Albrecht
Staff Writer
Katie Fehrenbacher
Staff Writer
Josie Garthwaite
Staff Writer
Close
E-mail It