<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SBC, AT&amp;T in Merger Talks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/01/26/sbc-att-in-merger-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/26/sbc-att-in-merger-talks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Blog - Rich Tehrani</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/26/sbc-att-in-merger-talks/#comment-100111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VoIP Blog - Rich Tehrani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/01/26/sbc-att-in-merger-talks/#comment-100111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;SBC, AT&amp;T Merge?&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om Malik sums up nicely the talks between SBC and AT&amp;T which were reported also by the Wall Street Journal and New York Times this AM. With the purchase of AT&amp;T, SBC would have a better entry into the business&#8230; &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SBC, AT&#038;T Merge?</strong></p>
<p>Om Malik sums up nicely the talks between SBC and AT&amp;T which were reported also by the Wall Street Journal and New York Times this AM. With the purchase of AT&amp;T, SBC would have a better entry into the business&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irwin Lazar's "Real-Time" Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/26/sbc-att-in-merger-talks/#comment-100112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irwin Lazar's "Real-Time" Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/01/26/sbc-att-in-merger-talks/#comment-100112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;SBC, AT&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pointer to Om Malik on Broadband which has been covering this story quite closely. &lt;/p&gt;

COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Charlie Sierra
&lt;p&gt;BellSouth will never allow SBC to do this deal without a fight.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;ATT CEO is an Atlanta guy, and Atlanta is home to more of the Fortune 500, than anybody except NYC and the energy firms in Houston.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Together SBC+BLS are the equal of Verizon, but there is no taste on BLS&#8217;s part to become an even more junior player.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I give kudos to SBC for some balls, or whoever leaked this story, and it is indeed a smart buy, but the current dynamics say this is the wrong time.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think the market would favor a BLS-T deal instead. &lt;/p&gt;

COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Om Malik
&lt;p&gt;Charlie i agree with you, I think BLS could make a bold move, jump in, and also scoop up qwest. i think at that point it becomes more of an equal partner for SBC. bit i guess it is not going to happen like that. i think i had predicted this three way last year, but SBC is the one surprising everyone. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SBC, AT</strong></p>
<p>Pointer to Om Malik on Broadband which has been covering this story quite closely. </p>
<p>COMMENT:<br />
AUTHOR: Charlie Sierra</p>
<p>BellSouth will never allow SBC to do this deal without a fight.</p>
<p>ATT CEO is an Atlanta guy, and Atlanta is home to more of the Fortune 500, than anybody except NYC and the energy firms in Houston.</p>
<p>Together SBC+BLS are the equal of Verizon, but there is no taste on BLS&#8217;s part to become an even more junior player.</p>
<p>I give kudos to SBC for some balls, or whoever leaked this story, and it is indeed a smart buy, but the current dynamics say this is the wrong time.</p>
<p>I think the market would favor a BLS-T deal instead. </p>
<p>COMMENT:<br />
AUTHOR: Om Malik</p>
<p>Charlie i agree with you, I think BLS could make a bold move, jump in, and also scoop up qwest. i think at that point it becomes more of an equal partner for SBC. bit i guess it is not going to happen like that. i think i had predicted this three way last year, but SBC is the one surprising everyone. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

