<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Very Briefly This Morning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Niederhofern</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/#comment-99889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Niederhofern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/#comment-99889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&#8220;&#8230;has anyone turned a profit so far on this open source thing.&#8221;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;MySQL seems to be doing well with the dual license strategy. LJ could be termed a &#8220;profit&#8221; in terms of return on investment. Some of the enterprise app companies developing their products on SF.net seem to be doing alright.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think the answer hinges on what you think is &#8220;open source&#8221;&#8230; GNU GPL? Then no, no one&#8217;s making any money from that. &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;has anyone turned a profit so far on this open source thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>MySQL seems to be doing well with the dual license strategy. LJ could be termed a &#8220;profit&#8221; in terms of return on investment. Some of the enterprise app companies developing their products on SF.net seem to be doing alright.</p>
<p>I think the answer hinges on what you think is &#8220;open source&#8221;&#8230; GNU GPL? Then no, no one&#8217;s making any money from that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/#comment-99890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/#comment-99890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Is reducing R&amp;D ever a good idea? That it is too high a percentage of your revenue says to me that your sales and marketing need work, not that you are spending too much on R&amp;D . . . &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is reducing R&#038;D ever a good idea? That it is too high a percentage of your revenue says to me that your sales and marketing need work, not that you are spending too much on R&#038;D . . . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/#comment-99891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/01/13/very-briefly-this-morning/#comment-99891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yup&#8230; that&#8217;s a clear sign that some things are not working. however i think nokia is trying to tweak its business model and is a company in transition so to speak. R&amp;D i think is a good thing. Look at Qualcomm and TI - they never cut R&amp;D but everything else is fair game for slashing &lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup&#8230; that&#8217;s a clear sign that some things are not working. however i think nokia is trying to tweak its business model and is a company in transition so to speak. R&#038;D i think is a good thing. Look at Qualcomm and TI &#8211; they never cut R&#038;D but everything else is fair game for slashing </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

