<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voom going to Echostar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/12/22/voom-going-to-echostar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/12/22/voom-going-to-echostar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/12/22/voom-going-to-echostar/#comment-99501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/12/22/voom-going-to-echostar/#comment-99501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It came to market 24 months too soon? Try: It never had any relevant time to come to market. In 24 months, the &quot;HD-ness&quot; of Voom would, indeed, be more desirable. In 24 months, however, cable and satellite will have expanded HD offerings to meet the damands of their customers. There was never room -- at this late stage -- for yet another satellite provider. It would have needed something unique and sustainable vis a vis competitive advantage. &quot;More HD&quot; is not even a little sustainable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It came to market 24 months too soon? Try: It never had any relevant time to come to market. In 24 months, the &#8220;HD-ness&#8221; of Voom would, indeed, be more desirable. In 24 months, however, cable and satellite will have expanded HD offerings to meet the damands of their customers. There was never room &#8212; at this late stage &#8212; for yet another satellite provider. It would have needed something unique and sustainable vis a vis competitive advantage. &#8220;More HD&#8221; is not even a little sustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

