<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Its all about the O.. OFDM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/11/21/its-all-about-the-o-ofdm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/11/21/its-all-about-the-o-ofdm/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/11/21/its-all-about-the-o-ofdm/#comment-4666</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fleishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/11/21/its-all-about-the-o-ofdm/#comment-4666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OFDM is also in the middle of a patent dispute with Wi-LAN of Canada claiming broad patents on OFDM technology, including some rights they bought from Hedy Lamarr (which are expired, but are intended to be moral rights, I believe).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OFDM is a very simple idea at heart. Instead of trying to encode data at a very fast rate monolithically (across all frequencies), you divide the amount of spectrum you have into small channels that each run much more slowly. It&#039;s a lot easier to deal with signal reflection and synchronization many different slower channels. Combine those channels and you get the full data rate. Make those sub-channels wider in worse conditions and you reduce speed, but not remarkably.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OFDM is also in the middle of a patent dispute with Wi-LAN of Canada claiming broad patents on OFDM technology, including some rights they bought from Hedy Lamarr (which are expired, but are intended to be moral rights, I believe).</p>

<p>OFDM is a very simple idea at heart. Instead of trying to encode data at a very fast rate monolithically (across all frequencies), you divide the amount of spectrum you have into small channels that each run much more slowly. It&#8217;s a lot easier to deal with signal reflection and synchronization many different slower channels. Combine those channels and you get the full data rate. Make those sub-channels wider in worse conditions and you reduce speed, but not remarkably.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
