Comments on: Why we need federal oversight of VoIP? http://gigaom.com/2004/11/08/why-we-need-federal-oversight-of-voip/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:11:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Skibare http://gigaom.com/2004/11/08/why-we-need-federal-oversight-of-voip/#comment-98836 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/11/08/why-we-need-federal-oversight-of-voip/#comment-98836 lets see, do the cities ”write” to Amazon for city sales taxes?????????

do the cities ”write” to EBAY for city sales taxes??????? Tell those CITIES to shove it where the VOIP SUNSHINE dont shine!

Skibare

]]> By: Kritik http://gigaom.com/2004/11/08/why-we-need-federal-oversight-of-voip/#comment-98837 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/11/08/why-we-need-federal-oversight-of-voip/#comment-98837 I can see that old-PSTN providers are lobbying hard in California these days. The monopolists are bitching about losing profits to competition. Well, screw them. I will support my local VoIP provider! Good-bye Verizon!

]]> By: Rakeman http://gigaom.com/2004/11/08/why-we-need-federal-oversight-of-voip/#comment-98838 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/11/08/why-we-need-federal-oversight-of-voip/#comment-98838 Gefahr für VoIP

Om Malik berichtet, dass einige US-Kommunen auf eigene Faust VoIP-Anbieter besteuern wollen – und zwar dort, wo die Kunden sitzen. Nicht dort, wo die Firma zu hause ist. Folglich schreit man ausnahmsweise nach der Regulierungsbehörde. Macht eigent…

]]>