2 Comments

Summary:

Business 2.0 online columnist Paul R. La Monicasays that Investors are hoping that AT&T, MCI and Sprint may soon get acquired…they’ll have to keep waiting. AT&T’s reported a $7.1 billion third-quarter loss due to a write-down in the value of its long-distance network, many expect the […]

Business 2.0 online columnist Paul R. La Monicasays that Investors are hoping that AT&T, MCI and Sprint may soon get acquired…they’ll have to keep waiting. AT&T’s reported a $7.1 billion third-quarter loss due to a write-down in the value of its long-distance network, many expect the consolidation to start soon, but La Monica doesn’t think so. He sees the speculative run-up in MCI stock as fool’s gold

Todd Rosenbluth, an equity analyst with Standard & Poor’s, thinks that Ma Bell’s debt cutting moves are all about survival, not for making the company more attractive to buyers. “Why buy a business that’s been declining 10 to 15 percent?” said Patrick Brogan, assistant director of research for Precursor, an independent research firm that focuses on telecom and tech.

Despite that, the price is still too high. For instance, Ma Bell has a market cap of $12.5 billion, and a net debt of $6.3 billion. MCI has a net debt of $550 million and a market cap of $5 billion. My two cents on this is that AT&T and Sprint should merge. They have a fighting chance if they do so. Sprint has enough local properties in the South East to keep it alive. The two companies can carve out a stable niche in business services, especially given that MCI is likely to implode in next 12-to-18 months. With Sprint experimenting with wireless-to-home bridging technologies like the one I wrote about, together they can really compete.

  1. Jesse Kopelman Monday, October 25, 2004

    What would Sprint get out of acquiring T? Customers that are becoming less valuable by the minute? Wouldn’t they be better served to invest that $20B in wireless to the home?

    Share
  2. acquiring – no merging. there are actually benefits. for instance the T brand is more valuable with large corporations. secondly, they can easily become the single largest data network and data center operator. i think there is a lot of fat they can cut and can buy time to grow the wireless business in addition. i am trying to say is that there needs to be no transfer of cash, but a sensible merger driven by shoring up market share and also cutting overheads on both sides.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post