<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel not inside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2004/10/17/intel-not-inside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/17/intel-not-inside/</link>
	<description>Business, Internet, Technology &#38; Strategy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Koslosky</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2004/10/17/intel-not-inside/#comment-3998</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Koslosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2004/10/17/intel-not-inside/#comment-3998</guid>
		<description>I guess I should get a subscription to Barron's.

Anyway, today's pulpmedia WSJ has an article by Lee Gomes:

"Thus, one of Intel's motivations is pushing WiMax is to keep Qualcomm in check, and to allow Intel to play the same dominant role in the emerging world or wireless computing that it now plays on the desktop."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I should get a subscription to Barron&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Anyway, today&#8217;s pulpmedia WSJ has an article by Lee Gomes:</p>
<p>&#8220;Thus, one of Intel&#8217;s motivations is pushing WiMax is to keep Qualcomm in check, and to allow Intel to play the same dominant role in the emerging world or wireless computing that it now plays on the desktop.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
